Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Washington DC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:5693
Registered on:3/29/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Which is a wild take because we both know if it was either of those people receiving $4 million over 20 years your melt would be seen from the moon. But carry on! ...
I’m sorry are you trying to compare $4k to $4 million like they’re the same thing!?? [embed]https://x.com/darrigomelanie/status/1799042647551824313?s=46&t=V-BD5Fsq2IwCoJOjj4dvcA[/embed]...

re: Elon Musk to buy Info-Wars?

Posted by mwade91383 on 6/8/24 at 8:13 am
This is like the 4th Alex Jones thread in the last 3 days full of idiots who do not know anything about the case. How does this keep happening!?!? AJs 1st amendments rights were NEVER infringed upon. Him being a piece of shite, hurting feelings, all of that is totally irrelevant. This is what ...
I think they actually outsource theirs. One of those partners is Gallup, who's solid/okay. Not sure who else......
I wouldn't put any stock in a Fox News poll. They're notoriously bad. ...
[quote]How did they overcome the actual malice standard? I don't think the liability portion of the trial ever went to merits and Jones was defaulted for repeated failures in responding to discovery. I believe this happened in both cases.[/quote] This is correct, and both points are linked. Ha...
We took two more and we have some help coming from HS ranks, I don't think we're desperate per se, but we are wildly unproven and might lack depth. I'm putting my faith in the coaching, which gota major upgrade at every level of the defense. I'm not aruging DL will be a strength in 24 but it coul...
Eh. Maybe. We’ll see what happens w the appeals but I wouldn’t hold your breath. ...
Can’t imagine putting much stock in a Tipp insights poll, which is notoriously terrible. And of course it was published in a British tabloid (which should also give you pause). ...
Lol another thread about nobody reading or actually understanding the constitution. I’m shocked! Pretty clear violation of the 8th amendment and will almost certainly be struck down, even by republican appointed judges. ...
I just can’t imagine trying to dunk on someone for posting here too often that you post THIRTEEN TIMES more. Sometimes, the jokes write themselves. ...
lol you have 65k posts. Maybe don’t throw stones??? You have NOTHING but time. ...
Did all those people calling Trump rapists/racists withhold and destroy evidence too??? I mean, it might be a LITTLE different. ...
Well you keep asking the same stupid question so you’re clearly struggling with something. Given that, hard to imagine you have any kinda grasp on this thing. ...

re: So Hunter will get convicted

Posted by mwade91383 on 6/4/24 at 6:37 pm
This is correct. Just goes to show, in 2024 most people only truly care about political issues when they’re convenient. Im not even arguing one way or another as it pertains to this case and Hunter. But it’s undeniable if this was Eric or Barron the multiple pages of 2A threads would be 30+ ...
Maybe read it. It’ll probably clear up a lot of tough questions you're struggling with. ...
Nope. And that’s not what the case is about. Have you read it? Maybe start there. ...
But no such thing ever happened. And no court (to date) agrees with you at all. If you read the case, you’d know this. He lost because he withheld/destroyed evidence. His rights were (and still are) intact. Defamation is not a right. ...
Classic bullshite artist. Keeps talking but never says anything or answers basic questions. ...
You said it was beyond, beyond what? It's your entire point, clown :lol:...