- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Le Tenia
Favorite team: | Atlanta Braves |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 4507 |
Registered on: | 2/1/2015 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 1:41 pm
[quote]It’s very clearly written. You are trying to interpret the rule as “if outside of the baseline after 45 feet the runner is out.”[/quote]
Dude, you're a fkn moron!! I have clearly written what I'm saying and even showed video links so that even a window licker could understand it. Keep pl...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 1:35 pm
He circled it more and should have set his feet. Griff would have fielded it and circled back to 1st to make the throw. AL called him off and the ball kept rolling out and he rushed it. He had time.
AL is also throwing to Bear's glove side....
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 1:31 pm
[quote]Which means he’s right handed. It’s what hand you throw not what hand the glove is on. Which is why left handed 1st baseman are defensively better.[/quote]
Yeah I was clarifying that he catches with the LH and the throw was thrown to that side which was towards the incoming runner.
It...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 1:05 pm
Is that a written rule? Link it?
[quote]NCAA Rule 7, Section 11 (p) : [b]In running the last half of the distance[/b] from home plate to first base while the ball is being fielded to first base, the batter-runner runs outside the 3-foot restraining line or inside the foul line and, in so doing, ...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 1:03 pm
He has to run the entire last 45' inside the lines you fkn idiot. I'm done with you...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:57 pm
Let me dumb this the fk down for you and your mouth breathing brothers and sisters. This will be my final post regarding this bc I'm wasting my time at this point.
#1 His last 3 steps weren't in the runners path.
#2 It doesn't fkn matter. At the 45' mark, a runners path is established by cha...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:31 pm
The runner takes one step in the lane and immediately runs out of it again....
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:23 pm
[quote]If the throwing lane is wide fricking open as well as jones being able to field the ball is wide arse open, then where is the interference?[/quote]
Did Milazzo throw it "right" to 1st base? I'm not asking if the throw was perfect. Did he throw the ball to 1st and was the runner inside the fo...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:17 pm
[quote]Because he was not in the throwing lane at all. If Milazzo throws it directly at first base it’s an easy out[/quote]
Does the rule discuss throwing lanes or angles?
Did Milazzo throw it "right" to 1st base? I'm not asking if the throw was perfect. Did he throw the ball to 1st and was...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:16 pm
RH thrower, LH glove...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:15 pm
[quote]And the rules then clearly states jf the runner is not doing so, it’s only interference if he actually interferes with the play….
So, according to the rule, you can run inside the line all you want as long as you don’t interfere with the play. It’s 100% written as such[/quote]
Geez. Ho...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:12 pm
[quote]LSU316[/quote]
I'm out. Here come all the tards, the bell must have rung and they let them out. Where is Rutard the Rain Man? ...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:10 pm
My reading is just fine. Can you comprehend what you're reading??
The rule clearly says that the runner must be in the runners path (the foul line and chalked line 3' to right that starts 45' from home and continues to the 1st base bag) all the way to 1st on a fielded play with exception to av...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 12:04 pm
[quote]That’s how my coaches taught me.[/quote]
100% how most every player is taught. It is done so to make it tough on the fielders and puts the judgement on the umps to rule on it. Exactly why there's chalked lines and a clearly written rule with an exception to avoid contact. What should be...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 11:57 am
[quote]NCAA Rule 7, Section 11 (p) : In running the last half of the distance from home plate to first base while the ball is being fielded to first base, the batter-runner runs outside the 3-foot restraining line or inside the foul line and, in so doing, interferes with the fielder taking the throw...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 11:33 am
The defensive and offensive play does not end when he releases the ball.
Nobody is denying that the throw wasn't offline. AL had to circle the ball and it appears he hesitates or something when releases the ball.
Where is the batter-runner when the ball gets to Jones? The rule doesn't say th...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 11:24 am
That wasn't an easy play. The throw angle is not a clear because he has to circle the ball and it will be a tight window and a close play. Bear does catch with his LH and the runner is running right at him inside the runner path and will have avoid contact at 1st which did not happen. The rule do...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 11:15 am
[quote]The ball doesn’t need to hit him and it doesn’t need to be a perfect throw for it to be interference. If, by the angle, it hypothetically impedes the throw then he’s out. The botched actual throw doesn’t change that.
It was interference…..case settled. Let’s all get on with our day[/quote]
...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 11:07 am
[quote]When are you going to shut the frick up? [/quote]
Why don't you STFU!
[quote]It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule.[/quote]
Well, that is easy to disprove since rule was provided on here...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by Le Tenia on 5/11/24 at 10:52 am
[quote]any good ump isn’t calling interference unless the runner is actually obstructing or attempting to obstruct the throwing lane ETA: this is how the rule is actually writte[/quote]
Why are you so sure that it didn’t effect him fielding and throwing? Was there a bad throw? Did he hesitate w...
Popular