- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare: how is this defined, and how can it be (legally) stopped?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
All litigation is driven by motivation.
But not all litigation is driven by the same motivation. Hence the term lawfare.
1
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
the definition of Lawfare is as follows:
"Lawfare is the use of law to manipulate public opinion and change political outcomes."
Lawfare as it pertains to Trump ..... They are not involved in the Lawfare operation to prosecute some form of illegal behavior. They are involved in the Lawfare operation simply to manipulate the public and change political outcomes.
The Lawfare effort is intended to embarrass Trump, isolate Trump, ridicule Trump and marginalize Trump.. Straight out of the Saul Alinsky handbook.
"Lawfare is the use of law to manipulate public opinion and change political outcomes."
Lawfare as it pertains to Trump ..... They are not involved in the Lawfare operation to prosecute some form of illegal behavior. They are involved in the Lawfare operation simply to manipulate the public and change political outcomes.
The Lawfare effort is intended to embarrass Trump, isolate Trump, ridicule Trump and marginalize Trump.. Straight out of the Saul Alinsky handbook.
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:40 pm to OceanMan
quote:
But not all litigation is driven by the same motivation. Hence the term lawfare.
That distinguishing "motivation" has not been defined in any meaningful way
Again, moving target.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Plenty of prosecuting agencies have run on being "tough on' the crimes they were alleged to have committed. Right now it's stolen firearms and fentanyl.
These are crimes. Not people. This is the distinction between lawfare and other prosecutions.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:43 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
the definition of Lawfare is as follows:
"Lawfare is the use of law to manipulate public opinion and change political outcomes."
Well, we need a bigger board. A new definition has been introduced.
quote:
Lawfare is the use of law to manipulate public opinion and change political outcomes.
So the 2018 Mississippi law that led to Dobbs was lawfare?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"Lawfare is the use of law to manipulate public opinion and change political outcomes."
You have to love how your TDS is blocking your brain from thinking this isnt whats happening to orange
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:52 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You have to love how your TDS is blocking your brain from thinking this isnt whats happening to orange
The problem is that it's going to encapsulate a lot of stuff people likely won't admit is "lawfare", like the 2018 MS law that led to Dobbs
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Let's make this very simple.
So can we use an example from Alabama and one from California to show this disparate impact?
And yes, I used disparate impact intentionally, b/c that's where we are headed with this rhetoric.
• Equal justice law delineates an offense, then attempts to identify a target regardless of political persuasion.
• Lawfare delineates a target, typically based on political persuasion, then attempts to identify an offence or offenses.
Regarding different states, different states have different laws. Your state lawfare premise would have accordingly different bases.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Great that still doesnt change the fact that your tds is causing you to deny this is lawfare
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So the 2018 Mississippi law that led to Dobbs was lawfare?
Disproving lawfare by introducing other examples of lawfare?
Bold move.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:56 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Great that still doesnt change the fact that your tds is causing you to deny this is lawfare
We have more than 10 definitions of "lawfare" in this thread. I don't know what lawfare is, and this board can't come anywhere near a consensus.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:57 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Disproving lawfare by introducing other examples of lawfare?
Your rhetoric hasn't improved from your infamous "colon" argument, I see.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what lawfare
not surprised you as a lawyer dont know what it is Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No. That is simply political legislation.
The problem is that it's going to encapsulate a lot of stuff people likely won't admit is "lawfare", like the 2018 MS law that led to Dobbs
It is perhaps partisan, as all legislation is.
But unless it is applied unequally, selectively attacking some centers while giving equally culpable centers a pass, it is not lawfare.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what lawfare is
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
thread. I don't know what lawfare is
Do you think all of the trump cases are just the law system at work?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
our rhetoric hasn't improved from your infamous "colon" argument, I see.
Difficult to improve on flawless.
I see you’re still upvoting yourself though.
Sad.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:10 pm to Robin Masters
I’m getting Destiny vibes from SFP.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You mean I test the various definitions? In a thread about finding a universal definition? Guilty as charged for the intellectual rigor.
This is the dumbest exercise ever. If you asked people to define the word supercilious, you'd get a variety of responses, perhaps citing various sources and origins, etc. The bottom line is, everyone knows that you are the embodiment of the term as you think it is your place to be the arbiter of such matters. You're a friggin' blowhard and your games aren't as fun as you think they are.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:15 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
not surprised you as a lawyer dont know what it is
10+ definitions just in this thread alone. Which is it?
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News