- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/8/24 at 4:41 pm to ronricks
quote:
People in Georgia not liking Trump doesn’t mean there was ‘fraud’. Trump losing doesn’t mean there was ‘fraud’. Donald Trump claimed the Iowa Caucuses were ‘rigged’ when he lost to Ted Cruz in 2016
That is what you guys are dealing with. Losing does not mean ‘rigged’ ‘stolen’ cheating’ etc.
There have been evidence of fraud. That fraud will continue.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 4:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yet you ignore the evidence to the contrary.
Nobody is ignoring actual court cases.
Rudy Giuliani acknowledges that he made false statements about Georgia election workers
Nobody is ignoring statistics.
Trump lost Georgia because of Cobb and Gwinnett counties.
Hillary was +19,164 in Gwinnett - Biden was +75,594
Hillary was +7,209 in Cobb - Biden was +56,411
Posted on 5/8/24 at 4:49 pm to Covingtontiger77
Any no one goes to jail, no one does anything about it, no republican other than a couple good patriots wanna know why????? It's past being old.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 4:54 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
Nobody is ignoring actual court cases.
Rudy Giuliani acknowledges that he made false statements about Georgia election workers
Nobody is ignoring statistics.
Trump lost Georgia because of Cobb and Gwinnett counties.
Hillary was +19,164 in Gwinnett - Biden was +75,594
Hillary was +7,209 in Cobb - Biden was +56,411
This thread has nothing to do with court cases. The voter fraud, if there was voter fraud, was done by filling out thousands of absentee ballots post election day to attain the number needed for a Joe Biden victory with legal registered voters who didn't vote. This is why it was only the five swing states needed to win that required the most time post election day. The reason you can deduce this is because it wasn't brought up for years to the public. All the other "fraud" claims from Gulianni and Powell were just distractions to get the foreign policies of the CIA and military industrial complex back on track. Ukraine, etc.
I liken fraud distractions to the student loan debt situation. Democrats want to buy voters by canceling debt. Republicans want to do nothing. The actual bipartisan way to fix the issue is to make interest rates anywhere from 0 to 2 percent. Students pay their money back, but also save thousands while doing so. This solution will never happen because it can't be used to buy votes and manipulate people.
This post was edited on 5/8/24 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 5/8/24 at 5:12 pm to Covingtontiger77
wow
Posted on 5/8/24 at 5:25 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
Nobody is ignoring actual court cases.
Fantastic. Give me your thoughts on the rulings of the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals and the Wisconsin Supreme Court?
quote:
Nobody is ignoring statistics.
Fantastic. Please post the last time before 2020 that a Presidential candidate won the bellwether counties that Trump did and lost the election.
After that we can go into the statistical possibility of the comeback made post 3am in several states.
I anxiously await your response.
This post was edited on 5/8/24 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 5/8/24 at 6:38 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Fantastic. Give me your thoughts on the rulings of the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals and the Wisconsin Supreme Court?
Which rulings in particular? The rulings that there were violations of state election laws and rules in Penn and Wisconsin? I've discussed Wisconsin's ruling before. I find it interesting. It is similar to the recent Georgia Election Board rulings though, fraud wasn't found in those court cases, only that there were troubling violations found.
LINK
quote:
The Campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable to the extreme
quote:
To the extent we have not made this clear in the past, we do so now. Parties bringing election-related claims have a special duty to bring their claims in a timely manner... The issues raised in this case, had they been pressed earlier, could have been resolved long before the election.
quote:
The time to challenge election policies such as these is not after all ballots have been cast and the votes tallied
quote:
Fantastic. Please post the last time before 2020 that a Presidential candidate won the bellwether counties that Trump did and lost the election.
It's never happened before. Is this proof of fraud? Do statistical anomalies happen in elections? Would changing the way we vote in elections affect turnout and therefore move Democrat's ballot harvesting efforts away from bellwether counties and cause them to abandon the old style get out the vote campaigns?
quote:
After that we can go into the statistical possibility of the comeback made post 3am in several states.
We can talk about states that counted votes past midnight? Can't wait. Although I hate to tell you but states counting votes isn't proof of fraud either.
You can't watch an election take place in a totally new way and then compare how and when votes are counted, which bellwether counties are won, without taking into account the affect of a completely new system. We probably shouldn't have shut the country down, given Democrats the money to fund their vote by mail scheme and allowed them to either change rules at the last minute or ignore rules and laws or work with them to change those rules and laws... but we did and here we are.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 7:09 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
Which rulings in particular? The rulings that there were violations of state election laws and rules in Penn and Wisconsin? I've discussed Wisconsin's ruling before. I find it interesting. It is similar to the recent Georgia Election Board rulings though, fraud wasn't found in those court cases, only that there were troubling violations found.
You should read the actual rulings.
quote:
The Campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable to the extreme quote: To the extent we have not made this clear in the past, we do so now. Parties bringing election-related claims have a special duty to bring their claims in a timely manner... The issues raised in this case, had they been pressed earlier, could have been resolved long before the election. quote: The time to challenge election policies such as these is not after all ballots have been cast and the votes tallied
No standing was the rulings before the election. So if you can’t file a complaint before or after, when can you file?
quote:
It's never happened before. Is this proof of fraud?
Nope. But it sure is evidence of its likelihood.
quote:
We can talk about states that counted votes past midnight? Can't wait. Although I hate to tell you but states counting votes isn't proof of fraud either.
Again. I was speaking to statistical anomalies.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
dp
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 4:54 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:51 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:52 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:52 am to jchamil
quote:
He was referring to his legal team put together to counter Republican election fraud, hayseed.
quote:
Sure he was
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 5:04 am to texridder
quote:Biden put out the "Inflation Reduction Act." Do you think that was to reduce inflation?
Biden said he was hiring lawyers to conbat Republican vote fraud. So you think he was hiring lawyers to commit vote fraud?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 5:09 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Biden put out the "Inflation Reduction Act." Do you think that was to reduce inflation?
Gee, i must have been mistaken. I thought we were discussing Biden's comment on hiring lawyers and vote fraud.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 5:23 am to Covingtontiger77
Nowhere does 5his video portray anything this guy says. Just s a yin.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News