- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning Discussion Thread. Spoilers allowed now
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:19 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:19 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Protocol is exactly what I want in an MI movie.
I liked Ghost Protocol, but the finale in the car park was weak. The villain was silly as well. Really? He wants to start a nuclear war because… Why? And where on earth does he get all the funding for his bizarre plans to start a nuclear war? He wasn't a billionaire or anything to start with, just some kind of nuclear arms analyst. Never made sense to me.
Posted on 7/25/23 at 5:32 pm to Handsome Pete
Bumping since I think spoilers are OK now.
Enjoyed it but thought it was definitely too long. Felt like two hours in was a perfect time to end the movie. That would have been pretty compelling especially since a major character dying then would have potentially brought people back for the next movie (a trilogy).
Cruise spent a little too much time running. Not sure that was a self aware parody (probably not).
Overall good and better in a theater than streaming. Not a perfect movie. Probably 8 out of 10.
Enjoyed it but thought it was definitely too long. Felt like two hours in was a perfect time to end the movie. That would have been pretty compelling especially since a major character dying then would have potentially brought people back for the next movie (a trilogy).
Cruise spent a little too much time running. Not sure that was a self aware parody (probably not).
Overall good and better in a theater than streaming. Not a perfect movie. Probably 8 out of 10.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 5:52 am to molsusports
Agree. Not the best but really good. Enjoyed the train scene. I expected a Ford Pinto to fall past them at any point. shite just kept falling. I started laughing at one point.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:11 am to molsusports
quote:
Enjoyed it but thought it was definitely too long. Felt like two hours in was a perfect time to end the movie. That would have been pretty compelling especially since a major character dying then would have potentially brought people back for the next movie
****SPOILERS****
I did not feel it was a long movie, but I do agree that it would have been more of a cliff-hanger and better ending point had they planned the Ilsa's death to be the end of Part 1.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:28 am to Doug_H
Saw it Monday thought it was pretty good. I watched all the old ones last week in preparation and kinda burned myself out, plus it’s tough for any movie to measure up 3 days after seeing Oppenheimer
Posted on 10/3/23 at 8:55 pm to cfish140
Did anyone find the flow of dialogue and the finishing of each other's sentences tk be off putting?
Posted on 10/3/23 at 10:12 pm to jmarto1
quote:
Did anyone find the flow of dialogue and the finishing of each other's sentences tk be off putting?
I just finished this movie 20 minutes ago and yes, I did.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 10:36 pm to Pandy Fackler
Hayley Atwell and her heavies were welcome though
Posted on 10/4/23 at 7:12 am to TigerFanatic99
Not sure. I view things by alternative methods
Posted on 10/13/23 at 12:31 pm to jmarto1
I just streamed it at home and holy shite I enjoyed it.
The pacing was absolutely perfect for an action movie. Liked the MI1 callbacks as well
The pacing was absolutely perfect for an action movie. Liked the MI1 callbacks as well
Posted on 10/13/23 at 5:52 pm to LSU6262
Overall it was good. Just those scenes where they spoke in an ethereal manner and finished each other's sentences bothered me
Posted on 10/22/23 at 9:20 am to jmarto1
quote:
Hayley Atwell and her heavies were welcome though
just bumping this to say that this chick is bad as helll. got an instant boner when she debuts in that airport
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 9:20 am
Posted on 10/22/23 at 9:49 am to Boodis Man
The motojump was underwhelming.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:04 am to sqerty
quote:I really enjoyed this movie, but I don’t think it had the big signature stunt sequence we’ve seen in past MIs. The motojump was good, but it was spoiled in the trailer. The train sequence was pretty good too, but I felt like I’d seen that same scene before in other movies.
The motojump was underwhelming.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:27 am to molsusports
Wife and I got around to watching this last night.
I guess my opinion of what comprises a good movie doesn't align with the mainstream anymore. We both thought the movie was terrible.
The acting was terrible and the story was terrible. It's just a formula-based overproduced, overstimulated Hollywood blockbuster that is just a series of action scenes connected together by a weak story.
Just my opinion.
I guess my opinion of what comprises a good movie doesn't align with the mainstream anymore. We both thought the movie was terrible.
The acting was terrible and the story was terrible. It's just a formula-based overproduced, overstimulated Hollywood blockbuster that is just a series of action scenes connected together by a weak story.
Just my opinion.
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 10:28 am
Posted on 12/16/23 at 12:47 pm to Chromdome35
I thought it was great
Posted on 12/16/23 at 4:28 pm to Chromdome35
I thought it was too long and the formula of the last three movies has run its course. The plot is beyond ridiculous. Fun to see Henry Czerny. Won’t be that interested in the second part.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News