Started By
Message

Daniel's fumble did anyone think it was targeting?

Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:08 am
Posted by Gee
Member since Aug 2013
41 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:08 am
Wasn't even mentioned on the air. Thought it should have been reviewed.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66808 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:10 am to
if Daniels stays on the ground.
Posted by Mako212
Member since Sep 2023
51 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:10 am to
Absolutely. I was screaming at the tv.
Posted by saturncube21
Member since Nov 2015
7408 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:11 am to
Thought he was doing the 2 step going backwards
Posted by Colonel Angus
Member since Aug 2007
1631 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:12 am to
I was actually laughing he got rocked so hard. Wish our D would lay wood like that.
Posted by TheEye
Rightcha.
Member since Dec 2006
4737 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:12 am to
It was. And Dart was sacked. Would’ve changed anything but those were missed/bad calls
Posted by ConcreteThreshold
Denver, CO
Member since Jun 2017
1193 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:24 am to
The hit OOB on 5 was also questionable. Surprised they didn’t even review it.
Posted by Hurricane2020
Member since Apr 2020
2473 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:26 am to
The hit happened in the red zone. If it was called targeting we keep the ball, get put on like the 10yd line and they get 1 less possession that they score a touchdown on. That single hit was a 10-14pt score swing in LSUs favor.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
5151 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:26 am to
No it wasn’t targeting, he was standing straight up & put himself in a vulnerable position
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66808 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:27 am to
that’s notnhowntargeting works

but it doesn’t look like he lead with the crown or hit him in the neck or helmet.
Posted by ConcreteThreshold
Denver, CO
Member since Jun 2017
1193 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:29 am to

He launched UP and hit him in the head/neck area.

Are you blind?
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 11:33 am
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
5151 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:30 am to
There was definitely contact with the neck/head area, but that happens to the ball carrier on almost every play.

Not targeting because he wasn’t a defenseless player
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 11:32 am
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7179 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:33 am to
I was not really asking for it, but I did notice that it probably fit the definition of the rule. My suspicion is that it was such an odd, awkward play that it didn't conjure "targeting" in the minds of the officials.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43890 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:41 am to
Nope. Clean hit that should’ve never even happened.

Daniels needs to learn to avoid those hits or he’s going to get hurt again.
Posted by demtigers73
Coastal Club
Member since Aug 2014
5529 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:43 am to
No!


Our defense sucks!
Posted by OlDirtyTiger7
Member since Sep 2017
188 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:51 am to
You are a fricking idiot who doesn't understand the rules of targeting. I swear there should be an IQ test required to post on this board.
Posted by ConcreteThreshold
Denver, CO
Member since Jun 2017
1193 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:53 am to
quote:

You are a fricking idiot who doesn't understand the rules of targeting. I swear there should be an IQ test required to post on this board.


He wasn’t defenseless by rule, but the defender crouched. Launched up and hit head/neck area.

It’s a valid question. Look at the photo.
Posted by OlDirtyTiger7
Member since Sep 2017
188 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:56 am to
1) Didn't lead with the crown of the helmet

2) Wasn't against a defenseless player

Objectively not targeting....
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30592 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Not targeting because he wasn’t a defenseless player



This is the right answer. At the moment I thought it was but when I looked it up I realized it was not.

https://www.secsports.com/article/27981840/what-targeting
quote:

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player


quote:

Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to:

A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass.
A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return.
A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
A player on the ground.
A player obviously out of the play.
A player who receives a blind-side block.
A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped.
A quarterback any time after a change of possession A ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feetfirst.


Had he started to slide, then it would have been targeting.
Posted by ZoeyD
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2020
56 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 11:58 am to
There is an IQ test. It’s called Idiotic Questions. When you ask one you get to post more often.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram