- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Basketball Recruiting Thread: 2024 (And Beyond)
Posted on 3/30/24 at 11:51 am to mmcgrath
Posted on 3/30/24 at 11:51 am to mmcgrath
If I remember correctly we started Wright, Williams and Stewart at the beginning of the year. I am pretty sure Stewart was meant to play the point of those 3, especially with Hannibal coming off the bench.
Which is another thing Hannibal had been key for CMM for the 2 previous seasons before coming into this one. Unless he was hurt at the beginning which I don’t recall, why was Stewart starting over him? If it was Hannibal in question I think we’d all agree he’d have a role on this team.
Which is another thing Hannibal had been key for CMM for the 2 previous seasons before coming into this one. Unless he was hurt at the beginning which I don’t recall, why was Stewart starting over him? If it was Hannibal in question I think we’d all agree he’d have a role on this team.
1
Posted on 3/30/24 at 1:07 pm to Stately
quote:
If I remember correctly we started Wright, Williams and Stewart at the beginning of the year. I am pretty sure Stewart was meant to play the point of those 3, especially with Hannibal coming off the bench.
We did start those 3. But Mike was the PG and Carlos the SG. Which was really super confusing, considering Mike was a SG in high school and Carlos was ball dominant at SC. Makes zero sense imo.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 1:09 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
I know he may not have been placed in that position by name, but if he has the skills to handle it I would have expected to see him gravitate to it more than he did.
Agreed. Coming into the season (with cook ineligible bc of transfer) I thought Carlos would be the 1 and Mike the 2. All the tape led to this conclusion… then McMahon comes out and has their roles flipped. And both really struggle in this position (I wasn’t surprised).
Then Carlos gets hurt and Mike transitions to off ball with cook and wright handling the ball most of the time and Mike plays way better. Go figure
This post was edited on 3/30/24 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 3/30/24 at 1:30 pm to mcmaniacinsaneasylum
Mike played fairly well at the point. But Stewart was no help at all. You would think that if Stewart was all that at point he would have handled the ball more, but he never did. If you are playing the 2 but can handle the point, you will find ways to do it. If your teammates think you can do it, they will get you the ball.
I know as a fan you might like to see Sewart out there for a few minutes as the sole option at point so you can judge for yourself, but there has to be a reason he wouldn't even help bring the ball up, or at least as I can remember.
I know as a fan you might like to see Sewart out there for a few minutes as the sole option at point so you can judge for yourself, but there has to be a reason he wouldn't even help bring the ball up, or at least as I can remember.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 1:32 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
I know as a fan you might like to see Sewart out there for a few minutes as the sole option at point so you can judge for yourself, but there has to be a reason he wouldn't even help bring the ball up, or at least as I can remember.
If he can’t play the point and sucks off the ball…. then why is he on the team
Posted on 3/30/24 at 6:20 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 3/30/24 at 6:53 pm to LSU1215
I really hate to beat this dead horse, but if we sign Vyctorious Miller... why is carlos on the team?
Posted on 3/30/24 at 6:59 pm to mcmaniacinsaneasylum
Can Stewart take the Dean role, of being on the team but not on scholarship?
Miller would be a huge get.
The theoretical future line up of up of Givens, Williams, Miller, Chest, and Williams would have to be a top 25 lineup nationally right?
Miller would be a huge get.
The theoretical future line up of up of Givens, Williams, Miller, Chest, and Williams would have to be a top 25 lineup nationally right?
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:05 pm to Stately
Your expectations for chest is entirely too high. Miller, Miller and Givens will be role players at best next year as freshman, much less rounding at a top 25 lineup. As far the future, it would be entirely too early to tell how any of those guys develop.
This post was edited on 3/30/24 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:14 pm to Tigerfan14
I wasn’t really talking about next season. More so 2-3 years from now. All but one would be too 100 commits ratings wise. The development part would be very telling of how good of a coach CMM actually is.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:32 pm to Stately
Even then, it doesn’t really work like that. Even with V Miller, we are still a middle of the pack signing class in the SEC. Other teams are recruiting better and the portal will continue to be a big factor. Odds are, that will never even be a starting 5 we will see.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 9:25 pm to Tigerfan14
quote:
Your expectations for chest is entirely too high.
Chest is solid. Not super skilled, but the type of guy every team needs. Effort, energy, high motor, good rebounder, athletic. He will be a solid player
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:41 am to Stately
If it takes another 2 to 3 years to determine if McMahon is the right coach for LSU, it will just be that much less excitement from the fans and donors,IMO.
He needs to be in the tournament next year. If his team finishes lower than this year, he needs another job.
He needs to be in the tournament next year. If his team finishes lower than this year, he needs another job.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 10:28 am to PNG Futbol
I don't know if I agree that he has to be in the tournament next year. This is a team that is losing 60% of their scoring and 55% of their rebounding. Also this year's team had a relatively easy SEC schedule getting Arkansas, Vanderbilt, and Georgia twice as well as State and Ole Piss both at home. That played a significant role in this team's success in my opinion.
However the thing we as a fan base can't accept is this team not playing with effort, and the returning players not showing signs of improvement. The effort we gave against North Texas in a home "win and advance" game was an embarrassment.
If we can finish middle of the pack SEC next year, get an NIT bid and make a strong showing winning at least one, that would be a successful season to me. Then the following year we will have a full team of his recruits, and that's when our final judgement should be made.
Frankly next year I would rather make a championship run like Georgia is doing right now in the NIT, then going one and done in the tournament.
However the thing we as a fan base can't accept is this team not playing with effort, and the returning players not showing signs of improvement. The effort we gave against North Texas in a home "win and advance" game was an embarrassment.
If we can finish middle of the pack SEC next year, get an NIT bid and make a strong showing winning at least one, that would be a successful season to me. Then the following year we will have a full team of his recruits, and that's when our final judgement should be made.
Frankly next year I would rather make a championship run like Georgia is doing right now in the NIT, then going one and done in the tournament.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 11:28 am to Stately
You can roll out all the excuses you want to for McMahon, but other than his first year, Wade had ZERO PROBLEM getting us in the tournament.
Had Wade been left in place, we'd probably have been a top 5 seed in a region, not pissing our pants over a girl's team (N Texas) bending us over in the NIT in our own arena.
In this day and age, with all of the uncertainty involved (NIL and portal), all you can really ask for is to make the tournament each year, and every so often get on a few deep runs and hopefully catch lightning in a bottle one year and win it all.
Only a few programs have REALISTIC higher expectations than that in basketball.
Had Wade been left in place, we'd probably have been a top 5 seed in a region, not pissing our pants over a girl's team (N Texas) bending us over in the NIT in our own arena.
In this day and age, with all of the uncertainty involved (NIL and portal), all you can really ask for is to make the tournament each year, and every so often get on a few deep runs and hopefully catch lightning in a bottle one year and win it all.
Only a few programs have REALISTIC higher expectations than that in basketball.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 11:57 am to tigahlovah
quote:He was doing none of that with an NOA. His recruiting class would have blown up, not that it wasn't overrated already. Plus the team would have gotten some postseason bans as well as several scholarship reductions.
Had Wade been left in place, we'd probably have been a top 5 seed in a region, not pissing our pants over a girl's team (N Texas) bending us over in the NIT in our own arena.
Instead now Wade is in the Southland competing against an actual women's college. But yes they do get an automatic bid so when Wade beats out the other "special" teams they can get blown out in the dance.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 11:08 am to Stately
quote:
I don't know if I agree that he has to be in the tournament next year. This is a team that is losing 60% of their scoring and 55% of their rebounding.
LSU is not alone in losing a lot of production. That's commonplace now in this era of rampant transferring. It's not an excuse anymore. The good coaches/program restock their roster from year to year and get it done. Alabama lost 5 of their top 6 scorers from last year's No. 1 seed team. In total they lost 10 scholarship players from last season. They followed it up by brining in 8 new players, getting a 4 seed, and now going to the Final Four.
quote:
If we can finish middle of the pack SEC next year, get an NIT bid and make a strong showing winning at least one, that would be a successful season to me. Then the following year we will have a full team of his recruits, and that's when our final judgement should be made.
This past season there was only one holdover from Wade's final LSU team, Wilkinson. It was fully McMahon's roster with HIS players (he recruited the transfers). So it is time for all of the non-sensical excuses to end and for him to start producing. If results similar to this past season is the best he can do then why continue on to hope for mediocrity? He'll have to replace a ton of production after next season as well because that is now the norm in college basketball. So if he can't win after 3 swings at putting together a winning roster why would you expect year 4 to be any different?
Stop looking at college basketball through the antiquated lens of the pre-freedom of transfer era. Roster building has COMPLETELY changed. So either he adapts and can win in that climate or you move on and find someone who can.
quote:
Frankly next year I would rather make a championship run like Georgia is doing right now in the NIT, then going one and done in the tournament.
And until you said something I would bet 95% of posters didn't even know Georgia was still in the NIT. It's so irrelevant now that they don't even play the championship in NYC anymore and many teams choose not to participate. Hell, LSU fans didn't even care given the home NIT game drew the smallest home crowd of the season! This mindset would be akin to saying I'd rather see LSU win the Liberty Bowl than reach the college football playoffs and lose the first game.
If LSU ever gets to a point where they are happier winning a meaningless and irrelevant tournament over reaching the playoffs with an opportunity to continue advancing towards a national championship then they might as well disband the program.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 11:55 am to Alt26
I 100% agree.
Excuse time is over. If McMahon is not in the tournament and LSU is not appreciably better next year, we should not continue to "hope" that the subsequent year will be any better.
Excuse time is over. If McMahon is not in the tournament and LSU is not appreciably better next year, we should not continue to "hope" that the subsequent year will be any better.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 3:05 pm to PNG Futbol
quote:As much as you love to repeat that, it isn't remotely true. McMahon has rebuilt the program from the pit it was in to have the base of a .500 team. Next year the expectation will be 9-10 wins. With a better OOC that should have us on the bubble of the tournament. It is next year's recruiting class, the 2025-26 season, and the 2026 recruiting class that determines whether he stays of goes.
Excuse time is over. If McMahon is not in the tournament and LSU is not appreciably better next year, we should not continue to "hope" that the subsequent year will be any better.
No one is going to make what he can do in the transfer portal this offseason the deciding factor.
This post was edited on 4/1/24 at 3:06 pm
Page 32 of 38
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News