Started By
Message

re: On course: Men vs Women

Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:42 pm to
Posted by Farside
Member since Feb 2021
45 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:42 pm to
The obvious distinction is distance, which everyone points to. You have to also look at type of course. If the rough is grown up such as a US Open, PGA, our Tour Championship, that hugely favors the men. Women wouldn’t be able to hit much more than a wedge out of that rough due to strength. The other factor is pin placements. Phil Mickleson played that Senior event and went really low. Afterwards he said he was able to take dead aim at every single pin. The pga guys can hoist a 5 iron straight up in the air, 220, as stop it quickly. There’s many more pins accessible to them than the women. Mickleson also talked about how cups on PGA were placed on knobs where it can get hard to be aggressive putting, but we’re flat with the Senior setup. I’m sure it’s the same with LPGA.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
5344 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:14 am to
I'd say if they played a full season on the men's courses, the top woman would be 10 strokes behind the top man. If the men played the courses the LPGA are playing, probably 15.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48999 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:43 am to
quote:

course: Men vs Women by WhiskeyThrottle
I'd say if they played a full season on the men's courses, the top woman would be 10 strokes behind the top man


If they made a cut, maybe at Colonial or Hilton Head.



This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 10:32 am
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48999 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 10:34 am to
At the height of her Dominance Annika missed the cut at even in the 2003 Colonial, Kenny Perry won at -19 under.

I would say on average female would be 15-30 shots behind the winner, if they ever made a cut.

Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72608 posts
Posted on 8/4/21 at 8:43 am to
Ok. We discussed it at the bar and have come up with the following.

On a longer more strenuous course, (men's typical layout) the difference per round would be 5-8+ strokes. It's not just distance. The women likely hit the ball a bit straighter on their courses. On the men's, they would have to be ripping at it more often, from the tees and fairways. This would likely result is more wayward shots. From the rough, they would struggle reaching many greens.

On the shorter courses, (typical women's layout) the men would have a difference of less...4-6 strokes. Around the greens the women are much more comparable, skill-wise. The men would rarely need driver so their accuracy would increase.

So what have we learned? Nothing, really.
This post was edited on 8/4/21 at 10:08 am
Posted by patnuh
South LA
Member since Sep 2005
6750 posts
Posted on 8/4/21 at 8:52 am to
Those long par 4s they will be hitting a long iron into the green vs a 7-9 for men. Likely can’t make any par 5s in 2 either. At least they are cute nowadays. Back when I was a kid, they mostly looked like me with tits.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17819 posts
Posted on 8/4/21 at 12:32 pm to
So far in the Olympics the difference seems to be putting. The men were making everything on these greens & the ladies are struggling, for the most part.
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4014 posts
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

So far in the Olympics the difference seems to be putting

.. and escaping the rough. Men got it out of there much easier than the ladies.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram