Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:16 pm to
Posted by ev247
Member since Nov 2022
317 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:16 pm to
Man I’d love to see your 3% then revisit idea but am still thinking about Exxon being (saying they’re) okay with 10%. Why wouldn’t Exxon sandbag Standard? Standard would be the bad guy in public opinion.

The public won’t read a DFS, and the Dec hearing revealed that the DFS doesn’t include Lanxess fees anyway lol. So no one can verify what royalty Standard can “afford” even if they read what’s available. So people will be left to their imaginations and assume Standard is just a greedier corporation.

Everyone hyped lithium as the next oil boom and now Standard has to stand up at hearings and explain why oil royalties aren’t appropriate. I’m on their side of course but wouldn’t want that job.

Any indication if April is still too soon to get the decision Smack?
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27379 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Any indication if April is still too soon to get the decision Smack?


Have no clue. I thought it was going to be settled at the last meeting. I know Exxon is playing some games. I'm ready to see Albermarle give some input. Somehow, they've gotten a free pass.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram