- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Good Lord, USC has 10 of the top 100.....
Posted on 8/20/12 at 9:10 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 8/20/12 at 9:10 pm to Tiger Authority
Usc posters on this board are pretty good.....all but the one above
1
Posted on 8/20/12 at 9:30 pm to redfieldk717
It's not that I mind their posters. I'm just sick of every poster that opens a rivals 100 for the first time chooses to come on the LSU board to gush over their recruiting. This might be their first rodeo but I was very involved in recruiting when Carroll was around so this is nothing new. It's USC, it's one of the few viable big time options for players out there and they recruit nationally because of the idea of So Cal and the media love. I'm just over it. This is nothing new.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 9:32 pm to Tiger Authority
I got ya, just couldnt miss an opportunity to bash the sc arse clown in this thread...dude sucks
Posted on 8/20/12 at 9:48 pm to HK53
Depth will be the Achilles heel of USC for the next few years. This years class is sick though.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 10:03 pm to ragacamps
quote:
Depth will be the Achilles heel of USC for the next few years. This years class is sick though.
This year will be the worst for depth. The team is very young. One more year of schollie limits after the 2013 class. Our depth will be better next year. However, huge drop off in the starting offense besides Lee. Depth will again be a problem in 2014, then we roll again. It's this year or bust until 2015, although we could land a BCS bowl in 13 OR 14, but only with some good fortune.
This post was edited on 8/20/12 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 8/20/12 at 10:36 pm to FightOn4ever
Oregon will sweep in and get 3-4 of theirs. Then we sit back and wait to see who gets sactions first. I'm betting on USC.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 10:41 pm to ole yeller
quote:
Oregon will sweep in and get 3-4 of theirs.
quite possible of they show us up, but I would say one or two and anyone or two would be big. Nothing less than 4*'s
Posted on 8/20/12 at 10:45 pm to Inspector37
if you look at past classes, USC is always stacked, and yet they still somehow lose to ASU by 3 touchdowns. hmmmmm. I aint worried.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 2:16 am to NeverRains
LSU has 8 and counting 
Posted on 8/21/12 at 7:22 am to Inspector37
I'm not so sure Kiffin is a bad Coach. I seem to remember UT playing really well in big games, ie; A blocked field goal is the only reason they lost in Tuscaloosa...
Posted on 8/21/12 at 7:35 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
Meh. I do that all the time on NCAA13
Posted on 8/21/12 at 9:28 am to Inspector37
Yes, but it takes a special coach atmosphere to get all those "big" heads to play together. Ask Notre Dame, for years they out recruited everyone but really don't have the championships to show.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 11:03 am to FightOn4ever
quote:
4 of top 12
5 of top 20
7 of top 35
9 of top 60
10 of top 65
12 of top 80
13 of top 100
9-3.....congrats
Posted on 8/21/12 at 11:04 am to FightOn4ever
quote:
4 of top 12
5 of top 20
7 of top 35
9 of top 60
10 of top 65
12 of top 80
13 of top 100
Who does that?
Posted on 8/21/12 at 11:29 am to Inspector37
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:47 pm to GeauxGus
All these rankings of players means little to me, just means you have a lot of potential. Whether you are the top rated or 200th rated, it all matters when you step on the field. LSU has shown you can find great players that are not ranked too high by rivals etc. USC plays in a lame duck conference. Imagine if LSU was in the PAC 10 ? 
Posted on 8/21/12 at 2:12 pm to ragacamps
its grim to see.
does he still use cheerleaders to go on recruiting trips?
or like Bama, do they use assistant coach's wives at USC?
whatever it is, is working.
our best hope for now is that the 10 scholarships they lose each of the next three years ends up creating lack of depth.
you can see they have 18 for 2013, apparently due to undersigning 2012 by 3.
does he still use cheerleaders to go on recruiting trips?
or like Bama, do they use assistant coach's wives at USC?
whatever it is, is working.
our best hope for now is that the 10 scholarships they lose each of the next three years ends up creating lack of depth.
you can see they have 18 for 2013, apparently due to undersigning 2012 by 3.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 8:55 pm to ottothewise
quote:
you can see they have 18 for 2013, apparently due to undersigning 2012 by 3.
Early enrolees
Posted on 8/22/12 at 6:44 am to FightOn4ever
quote:
4 of top 12 5 of top 20 7 of top 35 9 of top 60 10 of top 65 12 of top 80 13 of top 100
and no crystal balls!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News