- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:20 pm to I20goon
I certainly hope the defense plans to proffer his testimony.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:21 pm to Lsuhoohoo
What Merchan is attempting is to go the democratic way so that one day if there is a opening on SCOTUS he will be appointed by a democratic president. That's his idea.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:22 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Justice Merchan: Mr. Costello, I want to discuss decorum- you don't say "Jeez"
Costello: Yes, your honor. " Oh, for frick's sake!"
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:22 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Oh, and Janice Clark
Christopher Bruno has entered the chat
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:23 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Gosh figured SFP would be all up in here?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:23 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Haha! Costello DGAF!
This judge is pure evil.
This judge is pure evil.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:23 pm to chili pup
quote:
What Merchan is attempting is to go the democratic way so that one day if there is a opening on SCOTUS he will be appointed by a democratic president. That's his idea
He is too white and too male to get that job.
Only reason Garland got nominated was that it was to lock in a win if the GOP caved.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:23 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Who knows what the jury is thinking watching that.
If the judge isn't going to allow the defense to examine the witness, why let him call the witness?
If the judge isn't going to allow the defense to examine the witness, why let him call the witness?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:29 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
Who knows what the jury is thinking watching that.
If the judge isn't going to allow the defense to examine the witness, why let him call the witness?
Unfortunately I don't think it matters with this jury. Who knows what has been done to get to these people assuming they needed persuading.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:30 pm to Jbird
quote:
Gosh figured SFP would be all up in here?
If he is low on his down vote quota for the month this thread would be a potential record breaker for him. You know he has to be shaking all over in anticipation.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:30 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Who knows what has been done to get to these people assuming they needed persuading.
Clinton mob has, or will approach them.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:33 pm to Warboo
I am waiting for the response along the lines of the Judge is simply trying to get a handle on courtoom decorum.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:35 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Unfathomable that this judge is doing this crazy shite. Will there be repercussions?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:36 pm to Jbird
quote:It's telling that Merchan did not admonish Costello in front of the jury for the eye rolling and "jeez" comment.
I am waiting for the response along the lines of the Judge is simply trying to get a handle on courtoom decorum.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:46 pm to The Real Keyser Soze
quote:
This is what I don't understand, Prosecutors have an ethical obligation to learn the truth and dismiss charges when appropriate, why do they get to object to a fact witness that could help them learn the truth about the case they're presenting? They should, ethically, want to hear everything this witness has to say.
Where exactly do you think ethics comes into play in this trial? Seriously?
Bragg made up a felony charge to get this trial when it would have been at most a misdemeanor, which was past the stature of limitations (felony would be as well until the state of NY extended it due to COVID).
Wake up dude.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
I certainly hope the defense plans to proffer his testimony.
This judge may be biased enough to deny the proffer just so that Trump has to endure the additional time for the appeals court to remand the case.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:50 pm to Wildcat1996
The jury already has their minds made up.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:52 pm to bayouvette
Blanche is arguing for a dismissal now. I know it's routine operation but the idea of wasting time arguing before this Judge for dismissal is laughable. Better chance of rock growing wings and flying away.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 4:05 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
This judge may be biased enough to deny the proffer just so that Trump has to endure the additional time for the appeals court to remand the case
I was about to say I don't think he can since it's an evidentiary ruling...but then I remembered who we are talking about.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News