Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NFL has had the least parity among the four major NA sports over the past six years

Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:08 am
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33971 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:08 am
And strangely enough, the NBA has arguably had the most parity over that time span.

NBA

Six Different Champions
Nine (or ten) Different Teams That Have Made NBA Finals

MLB

Six Different World Series Champions
Nine Different Teams Have Made World Series

NHL

Five Different Stanley Cup Champions
Nine (or ten) Different Teams Have Made Stanley Cup Finals

NFL

Four Different Super Bowl Champions
Seven Different Teams Have Made Super Bowl
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40148 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:29 am to
Out of curiosity, why did you choose 6 years?
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45117 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Out of curiosity, why did you choose 6 years?


Guessing because that's when Kansas City won their first Super Bowl in this run.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15942 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:40 am to
Is championship games the best way to determine parity?
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60670 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

And strangely enough, the NBA has arguably had the most parity over that time span.


Why is that strange? The NBA can get 20% of their starting lineup in a single superstar pick. The NFL can get 4.5% of their starting lineup in a single pick.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47938 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:11 am to
quote:

The NFL can get 4.5% of their starting lineup in a single pick.


Kind of disingenuous when a QB has so much impact on the game
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:11 am to
Championships over just a six year span isn’t a great measure of parity.

That being said football in general has less parity than the other major American sports because it is the game in which luck plays the smallest role across large sample sizes. Being bigger, stronger and faster than the guy across from you matters more in football than baseball/basketball/hockey, and better teams can more consistently win by just leaning on the opposition for a full game.

It’s why a 12+ team playoff in college football is so fricking stupid
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60670 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:16 am to
Zero rookie QBs have ever won a Super Bowl.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66485 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:18 am to
quote:

six years


Nice rigged timeline
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96551 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:20 am to
MLB and the NBA, historically, have had the least parity.


If you look at who has won titles in each, both are overwhelmingly by a small number of teams.

Recent events are an aberration more than anything, especially in the NBA where injuries and age have helped dethrone a number of dynasties such as the Warriors.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21999 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

That being said football in general has less parity than the other major American sports because it is the game in which luck plays the smallest role across large sample sizes.
Counter point - that's why the other 3 major sports play best of 7 series in their postseason
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
203738 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:41 am to
A QB is only as good as his o-line and WRS….
Posted by Dairy Sanders
Member since Apr 2022
1081 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Zero rookie QBs have ever won a Super Bowl.


Feels like you should throw starter/starting in the qualifications somewhere
Posted by Dairy Sanders
Member since Apr 2022
1081 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:42 am to
quote:

A QB is only as good as his o-line and WRS….


Well you’re a quarter right.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39794 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Out of curiosity, why did you choose 6 years?
it helps support his argument best
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
6701 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 12:44 pm to
Because no other sport are wins and losses so determined by one person/position than QB.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45120 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

And strangely enough, the NBA has arguably had the most parity over that time span.


I'd say that isnt strange at all
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4347 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

That being said football in general has less parity than the other major American sports because it is the game in which luck plays the smallest role across large sample sizes. Being bigger, stronger and faster than the guy across from you matters more in football than baseball/basketball/hockey, and better teams can more consistently win by just leaning on the opposition for a full game.

This is what I thinking. Very well said.
Posted by Tim Gambill
Member since Nov 2023
679 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 5:03 pm to
Just different styles in script writing between leagues.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram