Started By
Message

re: Trump Trial: Judge Merchan won't allow certain Defense testimony

Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:40 am to
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63684 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:40 am to
Init is not typical in criminal trials to bring in “experts” to explain the law. That is the Court’s job.


As far as the e-mails are concerned, it depends on their contents and context. ;
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
4421 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Init is not typical in criminal trials to bring in “experts” to explain the law. That is the Court’s job.

Wait what? The defense already has their expert on the witness list and intended to call him to refute the testimony of Smith. It’s weird that they would also have an expert on campaign finance law already on the witness list if it is not typical in a criminal case.

quote:

Adav Noti—Noti is the Executive Director of Campaign Legal Center (CLC). Prior to CLC, Noti served more than ten years within the Office of General Counsel of the Federal Election Commission, in nonpartisan capacities. On March 1, 2024, the DA’s office informed Trump that it intended to call Noti as an expert witness to address the same topics as Trump’s expert, Bradley Smith (see below). Among other items, Noti might speak to the rules regarding a third-party’s payment of a candidate’s expenses and about how corporate expenditures, made for the purpose of influencing an election and in coordination with or at the request of a candidate or campaign, are unlawful.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram