Started By
Message

re: Trump Trial: Judge Merchan won't allow certain Defense testimony

Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:36 am to
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15508 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:36 am to
quote:

He also isn't allowing in an email that was sent to Cohen to impeach his testimony


It literally says in the evidence rules in all 50 states and in the federal rules that an out of court statement used to impeach is not hearsay.

Plus “battle of the experts”? WTAF? There’s always a battle of the experts. He’s just saving Bragg bc they didn’t present an expert in election law.

Hell - Bragg didn’t even identify a crime.

PS - the judge instructs the jury on the law, so usually legal experts are excluded. I don’t see this as totally off base as the freaking hearsay rulings this dude has made.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99363 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

quote:
He also isn't allowing in an email that was sent to Cohen to impeach his testimony


It literally says in the evidence rules in all 50 states and in the federal rules that an out of court statement used to impeach is not hearsay.


Yep. This judge should be removed, disbarred and imprisoned.

As for the expert witness issue, if the other side doesn't use one, that doesn't mean the defense cannot. If the state has presented such testimony, then this is fricking retarded and the defense should seek immediate relief from a higher court.
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
797 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

literally says in the evidence rules in all 50 states and in the federal rules that an out of court statement used to impeach is not hearsay


I haven’t seen the transcript yet, but the blurb I got on the email states it’s an email from an associate of Robert Costello to Cohen. The email author (Costellos associate) gives his understanding of Costellos impression of the meeting.

I don’t know if the defense plans to call Costello
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2143 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

He also isn't allowing in an email that was sent to Cohen to impeach his testimony


This is a much bigger deal to me than the campaign finance guy.

There was a meeting between Cohen and Costello. After the meeting, an email was sent to Cohen saying essentially, "just confirming you said 'x'"

Then, Cohen takes the stand years later in this trial and says 'y'

Defense wants to show him the email and the judge won't let them claiming it was hearsay. Defense even argued that they don't care about the truth of the email because the fact that Cohen received it and never responded is both probative and relevant. Judge disagrees.

This is one of the easiest issues a judge would ever see in a trial. It is 1000000000% admissible/usable by a defense lawyer in that context. Bad judges can make bad rulings, but this one takes the cake...there is no real way to look at it other than intentional bias.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram