- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Trial: Judge Merchan won't allow certain Defense testimony
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:44 am to udtiger
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:44 am to udtiger
quote:
It literally says in the evidence rules in all 50 states and in the federal rules that an out of court statement used to impeach is not hearsay.
Will SFP or VOR address this particular aspect?
3
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:45 am to SirWinston
For anyone who hasn’t noticed the other thread yet, Cohen has been pressed and admitted stealing tens of thousands of dollars from the Trump Foundation.
Yeah, I think his credibility is officially impeached.
Yeah, I think his credibility is officially impeached.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pod Saves America
Jesus you listen to that trash?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:48 am to SirWinston
quote:
Mate why are you so protective of an obviously corrupt system?
que?!?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:48 am to SirWinston
quote:
Will SFP or VOR address this particular aspect?
Keep reading bro
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:49 am to SirWinston
I assume that’s referring to an “admission against interest”. So yes that’s a thing.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:50 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Jesus you listen to that trash?
I listen to everything, on all sides. I listened after specific events. This year that hast been limited to one episode after the Colorado/insurrection USSC ruling, and briefly scanning recent discussions (not total episodes) specifically for this issue (to experience the opposing echo chamber).
The last thing you'll ever catch me doing is limiting myself to any particular echo chamber.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:50 am to MFn GIMP
I truly believe that we will see this drug out as far as possible and the judge will call a mistrial because of something the defense does.
This will allow all of the media to say he was not acquitted.
This will allow all of the media to say he was not acquitted.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:50 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
Merchan, just now, has decided that Trump's team can't use Brad Smith, an expert in campaign finance law, as a witness because it would "result in a battle of experts and confuse the jury."
Translation: We had no idea Cohen was going to be that much of a disaster and have to move the goalposts yet again.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
on all sides.
There's no value in listening to the retard sides.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:06 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
There's no value in listening to the retard sides.
Then we should have shut this board down after Q
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
Youtube Link
Keeping it 1600 (Pod Save America bros) morning after 2016 election
Keeping it 1600 (Pod Save America bros) morning after 2016 election
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 10:25 am
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:03 am to geauxpurple
quote:
ammunition for appeal.
I am convinced this was the goal all along - they probably knew they had no shot at a conviction (unless a windfall by the NY jury pool)
But the ace in the hole was a mistrial, that could not be addressed until after the election - giving the media the rest of the election cycle to gaslight the electorate.
same with appeals for a guilty verdict - which would would be icing on the cake for them.
only thing that will upset them is a 'not guilty' - but they are confident in their NY jury pool.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 11:04 am
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Is Anderson Cooper the "echo chamber," now?
it was as bad as the echo chamber reported.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:07 am to MFn GIMP
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:10 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Is Anderson Cooper the "echo chamber," now?
No, but I don't watch CNN
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The last thing you'll ever catch me doing is limiting myself to any particular echo chamber.
Got to give you credit for checking out different sources of information.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:10 am to Auburn1968
quote:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Having the ability to subpoena witnesses is not the same thing as having an expert testify.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
On re direct, the prosecution can only question topics that have already been introduced. They can't introduce new topics, right?
Asking because I don't know, I was never a fan of Perry Mason.
Asking because I don't know, I was never a fan of Perry Mason.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 11:18 am to tadman
quote:
Merchan, just now, has decided that Trump's team can't use Brad Smith, an expert in campaign finance law, as a witness because it would "result in a battle of experts and confuse the jury."
So the judge can decide the prosecutor's “experts” are ok, but not the defense’s experts?
Seems like it’d be both or neither allowed.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News