- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:54 am to MFn GIMP
Yeah, this judge isn't compromised.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:56 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
He also isn't allowing in an email that was sent to Cohen to impeach his testimony, because it is hearsay, but allowed emails only sent to Cohen to be introduced as evidence for the State.
There are a lot of factors in the foundation that aren't explained here. For emails generally, like all other out of court communications, there is always a hearsay issue that has to be overcome.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:56 am to TBoy
quote:
For emails generally, like all other out of court communications, there is always a hearsay issue that has to be overcome.
For impeachment? Do tell...
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:57 am to TDTOM
quote:
STFU
Stop crying, sissy
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:05 am to MFn GIMP
Trump just said the judge called them in an hour early this morning to prevent Trump from giving a scheduled speech.
This judge is pure evil.
This judge is pure evil.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:05 am to Wednesday
quote:
quote:
He also isn't allowing in an email that was sent to Cohen to impeach his testimony
It literally says in the evidence rules in all 50 states and in the federal rules that an out of court statement used to impeach is not hearsay.
Yep. This judge should be removed, disbarred and imprisoned.
As for the expert witness issue, if the other side doesn't use one, that doesn't mean the defense cannot. If the state has presented such testimony, then this is fricking retarded and the defense should seek immediate relief from a higher court.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:07 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
can't use Brad Smith, an expert in campaign finance law, as a witness because it would "result in a battle of experts and confuse the jury.
Isn't that the PURPOSE of an EXPERT = to educate the jury on UNDERSTANDING the pertinent details of the subject??
I'm confused
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:07 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Merchan isn't even trying to hide it. They're flaunting it in your face. The game is rigged.
Dude is an egomaniac with TDS and loves the celebrity this trial has brought him. He knows he's doing the work of the Biden Admin is untouchable. POS.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:07 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
The judge ruled that it doesn't matter if he actually violated campaign finance law...just that he had the intent to commit another crime. So, in his view, the expert does not add anything to the equation.
If that's true, that's the Eboni Johnson Rose level stupid.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:26 am to MFn GIMP
This judge is unwittingly doing Trump another favor with every decision he makes by adding to his already large arsenal of ammunition for appeal.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:28 am to geauxpurple
Having a conviction hold up isn’t his intent.
Having a conviction that Biden can run on, and a compliant House and Senate can DQ Trump over, is the intent.
Having a conviction that Biden can run on, and a compliant House and Senate can DQ Trump over, is the intent.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:30 am to teke184
A judge with that intent needs to be disbarred.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:31 am to DaBike
quote:
Yeah, this judge isn't compromised.
I mean, I don’t even really think “compromised” is a good word for what he is. I’m all but certain he’d never be anything but all in on the shite he’s doing.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:37 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
judge ruled that it doesn't matter if he actually violated campaign finance law.
W.T.F. ??
I thought that was an essential cog in the case.
So if he was ACCUSED of "intending" to violate campaign finance law by complaining about poor service at a Popeye's Drive Thru - that it would be OK to bring him to court for without any explanation???????
Don't us illiterates need some instruction on just what the f that means???
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:39 am to teke184
quote:
Having a conviction that Biden can run on, and a compliant House and Senate can DQ Trump over, is the intent.
All they need is any iota of media coverage to base their NARRATIVE on.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:40 am to MFn GIMP
Init is not typical in criminal trials to bring in “experts” to explain the law. That is the Court’s job.
As far as the e-mails are concerned, it depends on their contents and context. ;
As far as the e-mails are concerned, it depends on their contents and context. ;
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:40 am to MFn GIMP
Establishment only allows one expert to be involved...and it's the expert they select, who happens to say and do whatever they want.
shite is covid all over again, except at the judicial level.. when Fauci was the only expert we peasants were allowed to listen to. All other experts were basically shut down, out of fear of confusing us pissants.
shite is covid all over again, except at the judicial level.. when Fauci was the only expert we peasants were allowed to listen to. All other experts were basically shut down, out of fear of confusing us pissants.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
Mate why are you so protective of an obviously corrupt system?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News