- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do Children Have a “Right to Hug” Their Parents?
Posted on 5/20/24 at 6:39 am to I20goon
Posted on 5/20/24 at 6:39 am to I20goon
quote:
However, before going there and reforming that prosecutors and law enforcement should see some accountability.
Prosecutors and public defenders should also have to share the same pool of money. The government should not have all the resources to build a case against a citizen while the accused citizen gets table scraps to defend himself against the government.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 7:22 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Prosecutors and public defenders should also have to share the same pool of money. The government should not have all the resources to build a case against a citizen while the accused citizen gets table scraps to defend himself against the government.
I can see two sides to this.
I think overall I am inclined to agree with you on it, but it's a new idea to me and I might change my mind given more time to consider it.
One thing I have long been an advocate for, however, is professional juries.
The system would stop being as much about about who has the best lawyer if we had jurors trained in legal concepts who had experience in dozens/hundreds of trials. It would stop being so much about who could put on the best smoke and mirrors show by the lawyers because the jurors would see through that nonsense.
Also you could review the records of the jurors to examine them for patterns possibly indicating bias.
I think it would help tremendously in getting to the actual truth of cases.
Plus, I think that the "right" to a jury trial is the one thing the FF got wrong. I don't recognize anything as a "right" that depends upon the state compelling citizens who otherwise have no interest or involvement to participate.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 7:24 am
Posted on 5/20/24 at 8:10 am to 4cubbies
quote:
The government should not have all the resources to build a case against a citizen while the accused citizen gets table scraps to defend himself against the government.
I share some sentiment here. The legal profession should be the first socialized when you progressives take over.
I'd rather see LEO and DAs punished for pushing marginal cases personally. As long as I can shoot people committing crimes against me, I'm fine with y'alls bleeding heart approaches.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 8:11 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News