Started By
Message

re: Do Children Have a “Right to Hug” Their Parents?

Posted on 5/19/24 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50435 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

No, I'm using those words and your posting history to show to you how you are so easily distracted by ancillary issues and why those issues will never get fixed (ie: because they aren't root causes).



I'm still having a hard time connecting my saying that I don't if people are making the public unsafe while the people endangering the public are having fun to me not being allowed to have concern about corruption within our penal system.

Can you just tell me how these two things are connected?

Is the root cause of forcing people to pay for visitation them having fun? Is that your suggestion?

quote:

Impossible for you, I've already demonstrated otherwise.


You haven't though. You just keep bringing up me saying that I don't care if people at a parade are having fun while they are posing a thread to public safety and saying that means ... what again? That I shouldn't point out corruption?

Why not just explicitly connect the two ideas?

quote:

Because schools aren't prisons and kids in schools aren't there because they have been convicted of a crime which demands incarceration.


Does this mean you think there is something wrong with charging people to visit their loved ones if they haven't been convicted of a crime?

quote:

And yet you still haven't answered any of those questions


you need me to answer whether or not I think I'm stupid? You must be having a bad day.
This post was edited on 5/19/24 at 4:38 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51874 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I'm still having a hard time connecting my saying that I don't if people are making the public unsafe while the people endangering the public are having fun to me not being allowed to have concern about corruption within our penal system.

Can you just tell me how these two things are connected?

Is the root cause of forcing people to pay for visitation them having fun? Is that your suggestion?


No, and either you know it or you're just not able to grasp it. Your style of discourse seems to be to ignore explanations then pose questions base on ignoring them.

In other words, your engagement is insincere. You aren't interested in honest discourse, you're interested only in people telling you how right you are (even when you aren't). That's why you receive so much hostility when you post.

Case in point:

quote:

You haven't though. You just keep bringing up me saying that I don't care if people at a parade are having fun while they are posing a thread to public safety and saying that means ... what again? That I shouldn't point out corruption?


quote:

Does this mean you think there is something wrong with charging people to visit their loved ones if they haven't been convicted of a crime?


I've explained my position: the subject itself is only a symptom of a larger problem. That's your answer. You just don't like it because it doesn't fit within the binary choice of supporting your stance or disagreeing with it.

quote:

you need me to answer whether or not I think I'm stupid?




I baited you and you're now obsessed with the bait to ignore the actual questions. Please, feel free to quote all the questions I asked then explain how it devolves to just what you've stated.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram