- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Australian broadcaster humiliates climate zealots
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:23 pm to Geekboy
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:23 pm to Geekboy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Science has embarrassed itself by trying to demoralize climate crisis deniers by putting them at the same level as Youn Earth Creationists or Flat Earthers.
Fact is, these climate zealots are more like the HRCC trying to vilify Galileo for his views than acting like real scientists. They don't want questions asked or legitimate numbers debated.
Conform or be cast out - RUSH, Subdivisions.
0
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:25 pm to Bard
quote:
For those who didn't watch, his points were that:
*.04% of the atmosphere is made up of CO2
*humans are responsible for 3%
*of that 3%, Australia is responsible for 1%
Two of these points are stupid and the other is irrelevant. As I pointed out above, the 0.04% means nothing to anyone who isn’t an expert in this. 0.04% could be too much or not enough. There is nothing magically convincing about that. Humans being responsible for only 3% of the atmospheric CO2 could be meaningful, but not necessarily. Australia being only responsible for 1% of the human contribution is meaningless. If the human contribution is truly a problem then we should all work to lower it. If it’s not a problem then we shouldn’t.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:38 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
And not a lie was said (at least by him).
The questions I have are…
1. Why the war on farmers?
2. What is being done to address the oxygen “poisoning” being done to our plant life globally (as Carbon Dioxide is reduced)?
3. Who is behind this false narrative of catastrophism known as climate change?
4. What is the end goal?
All about control and enslavement. Getting us prepared for 15 minute cities/prison camps...
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:38 pm to Zach
quote:
The Netherlands has more forest land than Australia.
What? Australia would have 3 to 4 times the forest land of the Netherlands.
This post was edited on 5/19/24 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:39 pm to Geekboy
Come on bro. It’s settled science!
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:46 pm to Geekboy
CO2 is not a pollutant; it’s plant food.
NASA confirmed that the world since the year 2000, is 20% greener!
Greener is better! Warmer is better!
Drill baby drill, and let the libtards of other nations ruin THEIR economies.
NASA confirmed that the world since the year 2000, is 20% greener!
Greener is better! Warmer is better!
Drill baby drill, and let the libtards of other nations ruin THEIR economies.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 1:05 pm to Zach
quote:
The Netherlands has more forest land than Australia
Did you mean Austria?
Netherlands forest lands = 365,000 ha (hectares)
Australia forest lands = 134 Million ha
Also 10% vs 17%, Australia has more.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 1:18 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Well, that is the argument the Dutch govt is giving them. And the Dutch people aren't taking it well. Their next election is expected to move way right wing.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 1:27 pm to Penrod
quote:
If the human contribution is truly a problem then we should all work to lower it. If it’s not a problem then we shouldn’t.
That's the crux of the problem. The "science" behind the belief that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is due solely (or even just primarily) through human activity. I use quotation marks because while there is a rise in atmospheric CO2, there's no legitimate proof that even just the majority of the increase is due to the activities of mankind (for example, when looking at ice cores we can see that CO2 increases follow temperature increases about as often as they lead them, and for the majority of this time mankind didn't even exist).
Posted on 5/19/24 at 2:08 pm to Geekboy
If it hasn’t been said here this guy is a good follow and has no mercy on the cult of climate change with facts to back it up.
Chris Martz
Chris Martz
Posted on 5/19/24 at 2:17 pm to Geekboy
Perfect. Amazing isn't it that these politicians and liberals only parrot the mantra yet have no facts. They jump back like that woman on the panel and say, "Well I'm no scientist ". Well, if you don't know the facts how can you claim you're making a proper decision.
My apologies if I'm assuming that "womans" pronouns.
ETA These people would be amazed at the percentages of green house gases emitted by one volcano.
My apologies if I'm assuming that "womans" pronouns.
ETA These people would be amazed at the percentages of green house gases emitted by one volcano.
This post was edited on 5/19/24 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:01 pm to Chrome
So called "Scientists" have become nothing more than prostitutes.......all for the money.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:08 pm to Geekboy
This was 5 yrs ago fwiw
Posted on 5/19/24 at 6:52 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
The questions I have are…
1. Why the war on farmers?
2. What is being done to address the oxygen “poisoning” being done to our plant life globally (as Carbon Dioxide is reduced)?
3. Who is behind this false narrative of catastrophism known as climate change?
4. What is the end goal?
The WEC. Read up on their plans..... That's ur answer.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 10:15 pm to Geekboy
The citrus farmers of Florida should be able to sue the climate change zealots if they have been successful of lowering the temperature to where there are freezes that kill their crops.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 10:28 pm to Penrod
quote:
As I pointed out above, the 0.04% means nothing to anyone who isn’t an expert in this. 0.04% could be too much or not enough
His point wasn’t that it was a lot or a little. His point was that they didn’t know what it was yet they want to say it’s too much while completely upending the global economy. That’s a religion, not science.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News