re: Australian broadcaster humiliates climate zealots

quote:

---

For those who didn't watch, his points were that:

*.04% of the atmosphere is made up of CO2
*humans are responsible for 3%
*of that 3%, Australia is responsible for 1%

---

Two of these points are stupid and the other is irrelevant. As I pointed out above, the 0.04% means nothing to anyone who isn’t an expert in this. 0.04% could be too much or not enough. There is nothing magically convincing about that. Humans being responsible for only 3% of the atmospheric CO2 could be meaningful, but not necessarily. Australia being only responsible for 1% of the human contribution is meaningless. If the human contribution is truly a problem then we should all work to lower it. If it’s not a problem then we shouldn’t.