Started By
Message

re: Does St. George start a pattern?

Posted on 5/17/24 at 1:37 pm to
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28588 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 1:37 pm to
St. George didn't start anything. It's actually following in the footsteps of other cities. The only difference is BR didn't give a damn about a little small town like Central. But once someone suggested ending the BR gravy train all hell broke loose.

The arguments against St. George were always a complete farce. At one point in history the area that is now the city of Baton Rouge was not an incorporated city. So why shouldn't another unincorporated area be allowed to form their own city?
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 4:34 pm
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25416 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:36 am to
quote:

St. George didn't start anything. It's actually following in the footsteps of other cities. The only difference is BR didn't give a damn about a little small town like Central. But once someone suggested ending the BR gravy train all hell broke loose.



Correct. The real change here is that St George is comparatively huge and relatively well off already. It’s hard for the parish to ignore that.

Central was a small town when it incorporated. It’s grown a bit in population and economic prosperity since then but EBR didn’t really care about it at the time.

St George will probably grow in the future if they get their own schools. If Central can figure out how to mitigate flood risks, they are going to continue growing too.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram