- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/20/24 at 7:10 am to Bham4Tide
Because money
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 7:11 am
Posted on 5/20/24 at 7:30 am to Esquire
quote:
Would you think it’s odd if the ones in this thread with the strongest feelings about these movies do not have any kids?
Seems to happen a lot on here
Posted on 5/20/24 at 7:49 am to 225rumpshaker
quote:
Seems like a pretty logical choice to make a sequel given how teenagers go through a lot of changes that the "emotions" from part 1 would need to adapt to all the new feels.
This.
Even walking out of the theater after watching Inside Out the first time, my wife and I were talking about how it sets itself up well for more movies because of that reason.
I’m actually surprised it took them this long to produce it.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 2:57 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
While I haven’t seen it, everyone who has pretty much unanimously agree that it is Woke.
there is a lesbian character in it and that’s the only thing that’s woke.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 4:13 pm to SammyTiger
quote:feelings are woke and only for betas
there is a lesbian character in it and that’s the only thing that’s woke.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 5:51 pm to OMLandshark
I think all 3 of those options are perfectly fine. Kids do too. All 3 are appropriate(I’m assuming Blues Clues is, I didn’t even know that was still on honestly).
My kids love Bluey because the dad does funny things, not because of any story that I enjoy.
My kids love Bluey because the dad does funny things, not because of any story that I enjoy.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:26 pm to DBG
quote:
All 3 are appropriate(I’m assuming Blues Clues is, I didn’t even know that was still on honestly).
Well Blue’s Clues certainly isn’t, and I think you’ll agree with me here:
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:29 pm to OMLandshark
Yeah, no one's watching that.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
the standard of... Looney Tunes,
Don't get me wrong, Looney Tunes is the gold standard for me when it comes to cartoons.
But if those shorts that were made in the 1940's where Bugs is cross-dressing were made today, you and the rest of the usual M/TV skyscreamers would be clutching soooo many pearls about how woke that is.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:36 pm to Broski
quote:
But if those shorts that were made in the 1940's where Bugs is cross-dressing were made today, you and the rest of the usual M/TV skyscreamers would be clutching soooo many pearls about how woke that is.
No because that’s the fricking joke. Elmer is falling for this obvious bullshite and that’s what makes it funny. Bugs is not actually transgendered or actually saying he’s a woman and lecturing us about it. He’s humiliating Elmer, which is what is funny. So no, completely different.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:43 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
So no, completely different.
It's really not that different, considering that the argument the pearl clutchers have made nowadays is "I don't want my precious child exposed to LGBT stuff." Whether it's a joke or not, you and the others would still complain if that stuff was happening today.
But B+ attempt on trying to rationalize the difference.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:44 pm to Broski
quote:
It's really not that different, considering that the argument the pearl clutchers have made nowadays is "I don't want my precious child exposed to LGBT stuff." Whether it's a joke or not, you and the others would still complain if that stuff was happening today.
That’s not LGBT. That is Bugs yanking Elmer’s chain. It is not at all equivalent to what is happening today.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
That’s not LGBT. That is Bugs yanking Elmer’s chain..
It's still a dude in drag kissing another dude on a big screen meant for children. If you really think the far right wouldn't have a problem with that in 2024, I have some awesome beach front property in Kentucky to show you.
I'm downgrading your B+ to a C+ for doubling down.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 9:56 pm to Broski
quote:
It's still a dude in drag kissing another dude on a big screen meant for children. If you really think the far right wouldn't have a problem with that in 2024, I have some awesome beach front property in Kentucky to show you
Let me explain the joke to you since you clearly don’t understand it. The adults and the kids understand that Bugs is male. Bugs is being silly being a clear male dressing like a female. Elmer Fudd is stupid. Elmer will buy anything with a wig in it being a woman. Bugs is in drag to humiliate Elmer, and when Elmer falls for it and finds out, he gets pissed off and we all laugh that he fell for it.
The crossdressers largely but not exclusively in today’s kids cartoons demand to be seen and treated as actual women. It’s not a joke either. It presents to kids that these are who these people truly are, and if you don’t acknowledge them, then you are the bad guy and evil.
Happy to help out explaining jokes to idiots.
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:00 pm to OMLandshark
Big guy, I get the joke.
I'm say you and the "everything is woke" skyscreamers wouldn't see it, because you'd be too busy watching youtube videos from nerds saying hollywood is failing because Bugs Bunny wears a dress and kisses a dude in the next short, without knowing any context.
Hell it happened when the New Looney Tunes shorts came out on Max a couple of years ago. There was a thread on here about people losing their damn minds because Elmer had a scyth instead of a gun. Everyone thought it was some woke movement to take guns out, when the short in question had Elmer as a farmer or some shite. And then in the next short Elmer was in, he was back to being a hunter. So everyone crying woke for so no reason.
The fact that I had to spell that out for you, I'm pushing the C+ to an F.
You failed... again.
I'm say you and the "everything is woke" skyscreamers wouldn't see it, because you'd be too busy watching youtube videos from nerds saying hollywood is failing because Bugs Bunny wears a dress and kisses a dude in the next short, without knowing any context.
Hell it happened when the New Looney Tunes shorts came out on Max a couple of years ago. There was a thread on here about people losing their damn minds because Elmer had a scyth instead of a gun. Everyone thought it was some woke movement to take guns out, when the short in question had Elmer as a farmer or some shite. And then in the next short Elmer was in, he was back to being a hunter. So everyone crying woke for so no reason.
The fact that I had to spell that out for you, I'm pushing the C+ to an F.
You failed... again.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:05 pm to Broski
If you think it’s LGBT related, then you don’t get the joke.
Because the morons who wrote the show thought getting shot with a gun was more violent than getting beheaded with a scythe. We’re ridiculing these people because they’re insanely stupid.
quote:
There was a thread on here about people losing their damn minds because Elmer had a scyth instead of a gun.
Because the morons who wrote the show thought getting shot with a gun was more violent than getting beheaded with a scythe. We’re ridiculing these people because they’re insanely stupid.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 5/20/24 at 10:12 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If you think it’s LGBT related,
How many times do I have to say that I know it's not LGBT related?
How do you not get it?
quote:
Because the morons who wrote the show thought getting shot with a gun was more violent than getting beheaded with a scythe. We’re ridiculing these people because they’re insanely stupid.
Nope, that was all conjecture by the youtube nerds who thought Looney Tunes was getting attacked. Turns out, just like in some shorts in the 40's and 50's, Elmer can be something other than a hunter every now and then.
Stop being obtuse.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News