Started By
Message

re: See, the animals are gay too

Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
13044 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

If humans "are just born that way" when it comes to LGBTQ+ issues, then there is no moral discussion to be had, which is why this narrative is pushed so hard.

Animals also murder each other out of competition for pussy and for other instinctive reasons.

Guess we should redefine civil behavior to include murder too.

Posted by Porpus
Covington, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1677 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Sin doesn't apply to animals but it does to human beings. What they are promoting is the lack of moral agency in humans when comparing things like sexuality to animals, who are not moral agents and are not held to moral standards of theft, murder, or rape.

If humans "are just born that way" when it comes to LGBTQ+ issues, then there is no moral discussion to be had, which is why this narrative is pushed so hard.

It's pretty revealing that leftists argue, at times, that "animals do it so it's natural, i.e. OK." You really have to be a moral retard to get anywhere near that argument.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19802 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

These groomers have WAY too much time on their hands.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Of course. You did it all on your own. I agree with your answer. That's why I guided you to it.

Guided me to it? I really do enjoy you.

Ok. Let’s recap. I asked you if you believe that what is natural for an animal is natural for a human. My answer is no. You’re saying that you agree with my answer? On what grounds?
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37437 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

I sure do, and that's kind of the point.



quote:

Regardless, it does dispel the idiotic idea that it's "unnatural."



If you're into this argument to say it's "natural," because it "exists," what's the point of that? That's not what anyone means. And it's a different conversation to say an action, is "natural." Natural is typically pointing to material things, things that exist. This isn't a thing, it's an act. It's "natural" that I can punch someone in the face. Ok? That says nothing about what the action means.

It isn't "natural" by the LGBTQ side of the equation because of what they infer into the word. And it obviously isn't "natural" from the other side because they directly view it as unnatural.

All you are saying a thing can put it's penis in another thing as a fact. ...

Ok And?


A dude could put his penis in a hole in a tree. That doesn't make whatever that would be "natural." Or in your definition does it?
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 5:56 pm
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18059 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Those are just young inexperienced horny male lions that don't know what they are doing yet. There's no real penetration going on there and once they get their first taste of pussy they won't be engaging in that type of behavior anymore.



All that needs is a David Attenborough voiceover to give it an air of authority.

It damn sure is good to have you back!





Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Guided me to it?


Correct.

quote:

Let’s recap. I asked you if you believe that what is natural for an animal is natural for a human. My answer is no. You’re saying that you agree with my answer? On what grounds?


Incorrect.

You asked:
quote:

How does that apply to the conversation?


You had a misguided understanding of my position. You corrected that...with my help.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

If you're into this argument to say it's "natural," because it "exists," what's the point of that?


That isn't why I'm here.

People who pretend it's "normal" are just as ignorant as people who pretend it's "unnatural."
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

You had a misguided understanding of my position. You corrected that...with my help.

Thanks, I guess. So, let’s go back to the original question. Do you believe that all that is natural for an animal is natural for a human?
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37600 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

To establish dominance or something. Not because they prefer other male lions to female lions, though. Why do YOU think they are doing it?



You made him back down QUICK
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Thanks, I guess.




quote:

So, let’s go back to the original question. Do you believe that all that is natural for an animal is natural for a human?


That isn't the original question. That was a follow on question, and I'm ignoring it because it's irrelevant to any point I've made.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

You made him back down QUICK




What the frick thread are you reading, Fudd?
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37437 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

ignorant as people who pretend it's "unnatural."


Again, to say an act is "natural," is a pretty big stretch and a misuse of the word.

Natural is typically referring to tangible reality. As in, a thing made of atoms constructed in nature. And a thing that man has to create and interrupt nature. That's what the definition points to.


When people say it is "unnatural," they are typically speaking from the perspective of "natural law," and not the existence of thing itself. They aren't ignorant. They typically mean that the thing is not "in the order of nature," nature being in alignment with something - typically God. "Naturalness," is then directly related to the alignment of existence, action and will.


So then why are you here? And why is it important that a thing can do a thing? Things can do lots of things.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 6:09 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Again, to say an act is "natural," is a pretty big stretch and a misuse of the word.


I posted the definition of the word for this very reason.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22791 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Lot of the things Alex Jones says comes true way later.


This isn't some news that Alex Jones broke. It was science that Alex Jones was telling people about. This is KNOWN. This is NOT NEW!

This is nothing more than our waterways are polluted with drugs.

The craziest thing about this Alex Jones Frogs are gay stuff is it was the truth and the truth turned a lot of people away from Alex Jones in this case.



Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

That was a follow on question, and I'm ignoring it because it's irrelevant to any point I've made.

Nope. Very relevant to the “point” you made when you said:


quote:

Regardless, it does dispel the idiotic idea that it's "unnatural."


I think we’re all aware of the intent of the original post/thread. To which, Great Plains Drifter attempted to write it off as “these people have way too much time on their hands,” and to which Alt26 replied “ No, they have an agenda. To "normalize" something that isn't "normal"
To which you replied “Maybe. Regardless, it does dispel the idiotic idea that it's "unnatural."

It seems like you’re saying that it’s not unnatural for two dudes to bang, because it’s not unnatural for two male animals to bang. Maybe I have misunderstood you. Perhaps you could clarify this possible misunderstanding.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Nope.


Yep.

Like I said, if you want to have a different conversation, find someone else.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Like I said, if you want to have a different conversation, find someone else.


Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73058 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:39 pm to
Nah. I'm just not interested in the discussion you want to have. It's not a big deal.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Nah. I'm just not interested in the discussion you want to have. It's not a big deal.

No worries. Maybe another time. Have a great weekend. (Maybe go to church? )
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram