- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Federal Circuit Court Finds Convicted Felons Can Own Guns After Discharge
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:57 am to Midget Death Squad
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:57 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Are we talking violent crimes? If so then no right to weapons ever. White collar? We can talk
Explain yourself.
Why does someone who drives drunk be allowed to continue driving? Own a car? Etc?
Why does someone who commits fraud be allowed to even have a bank account? A credit card?
You’re a simpleton who is parroting deep state talking points.
The 2nd Amendment SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED….no qualifiers.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:09 am to ValhallaAwaits
quote:
Explain yourself.
A person who commits a violent crime has displayed the will to injure other law abiding citizens. They have both proven to not be responsible to legally have a firearm just as they have broken the social contract.
quote:
Why does someone who drives drunk be allowed to continue driving? Own a car? Etc?
After multiple infractions they aren't
quote:
Why does someone who commits fraud be allowed to even have a bank account? A credit card?
They do with shitty credit and high interest rates, thus penalties for their past crimes. The real question is should they be allowed to manage a hedge fund, not have a bank account.
Should a pharmacist who gets busted selling oxy on the side be allowed to be a pharmacist upon release from jail?
quote:
The 2nd Amendment SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED….no qualifiers.
See my above post. We are not speaking of law abiding citizens protected by the Constitution. We are speaking of criminals who have broken the social contract, thus their admittance back into said contract is not unconditional. If you want to argue that they OUGHT to be, then that is a fair argument to be had. If you are saying they automatically are, then you are wrong. The moment anyone is put in jail is the moment that person's rights are removed. Isn't freedom guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? How are we able to imprison them?
quote:
You’re a simpleton who is parroting deep state talking points.
Oh how did I miss this juicy one.
Is this the best you got?
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 11:17 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News