Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NAHB 10-Point Plan to Tame Shelter Inflation, Ease the Housing Affordability Crisis

Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:02 pm
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15776 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:02 pm
Good info on what's happening in the industry and not being reported in the media - especially about the IECC 2021 standards and FHA requiring builders to adopt them in order for buyers to be able to obtain FHA financing on new construction.

Full message here.

quote:

With a nationwide shortage of roughly 1.5 million housing units that is making it increasingly difficult for American families to afford to purchase or rent a home, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) today unveiled a 10-point housing plan designed to tame shelter inflation and ease the housing affordability crisis by removing barriers that hinder the construction of new homes and apartments.

“The lack of homes is the primary cause of growing housing affordability challenges,” said NAHB Chairman Carl Harris, a custom home builder from Wichita, Kan. “Any policy that seeks to improve affordability without addressing the need to increase the supply of single-family and multifamily for-sale and for-rent housing is doomed to fail.”

Shelter inflation – rent and homeownership costs – is still rising well above a 5% rate, and for the past year, more than half of overall inflation in the economy has been due to rising housing costs. The only way to effectively tame shelter inflation – particularly with elevated interest rates for both mortgages and development/construction loans – is to build more attainable, affordable housing.

With policymakers at all levels of government looking for ways to provide more affordable homeownership and rental housing opportunities for all Americans, NAHB is offering a plan that outlines initiatives that can be taken at the local, state and federal levels to address the root of the problem – the impediments to increasing the nation’s housing supply.

Eliminate excessive regulations. On average, regulations account for nearly 25% of the cost of a single-family home and more than 40% of the cost of a typical apartment development. Agencies and officials at all levels of government must thoughtfully consider the true effect regulations have on small businesses by requiring a more thorough analysis, including indirect costs associated with a proposed rule.

...

Promote careers in the skilled trades. In any given month, there is a shortage of roughly 400,000 construction workers, and home builders will need to add 2.2 million new workers over the next three years just to keep up with demand.

...

Fix building material supply chains and ease costs. The cost of building materials has surged 38% since the pandemic, with the four-fold lumber price spike in 2021 adding more than $30,000 to the price of an average new single-family home. The price of distribution transformers is up 72% since February 2020, and the severe shortage of transformers is delaying housing projects across the nation. Federal policymakers can help mend faulty building material supply chains and ease price spikes and volatility through boosting the production of sorely needed transformers and other materials, ending tariffs on Canadian lumber shipments into the U.S. and on building materials coming from China, and increasing the domestic supply of timber from federally owned lands in an environmentally responsive manner.

Pass federal tax legislation to expand the production of affordable and attainable housing. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit finances the production of affordable rental housing, but demand for this housing greatly exceeds available resources. NAHB supports bipartisan legislation to increase resources for this program. NAHB also supports bipartisan proposals to create a new tax credit to produce affordable workforce rental housing geared toward middle-income households, such as teachers, health care professionals and law enforcement.

Overturn inefficient local zoning rules. Many local and state governments have adopted zoning laws that inhibit home construction and drive up costs. Inefficient land use policies make it harder and more expensive to build. Localities need to rework their zoning plans to increase density and allow more flexibility for developers. NAHB supports ideas such as reducing minimum lot sizes, allowing more accessory dwelling units, minimizing parking requirements and promoting missing middle housing (townhomes and duplexes). In addition, localities should consider a range of housing types, including multifamily; opening up areas where residential development has not been previously allowed; and prioritizing development around existing or planned transit stations. Accommodating these ideas can increase supply and lower overall housing costs.

Alleviate permitting roadblocks. Permitting delays at all levels of government delay housing projects and raise construction costs. At the federal level, Congress can reform the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to expedite the permitting processes by providing clarity and predictability while respecting environmental safeguards. Obtaining a CWA Section 404 permit takes upwards of one year, and completing a required ESA consultation can take years. At the state level, the Building Industry Association of Washington estimates that the average permitting delay in the state is 6.5 months and costs home buyers more than $31,000. One easy solution is a time limit on how long the government has to either deny or approve a permit. If the time limit ends without action, the permit is deemed approved.

Adopt reasonable and cost-effective building codes. New homes are resilient and energy efficient, yet there continues to be a push to mandate the use of restrictive, costly energy codes that raise housing costs while providing little energy savings to consumers. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently finalized a decision that requires them to insure mortgages for new single-family homes only if they are built to the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and HUD-financed multifamily housing be built to 2021 IECC or ASHRAE 90.1-2019. A study by the Home Builders Association of Greater Kansas City found that building to the 2021 IECC can add as much as $31,000 to the price of a new home while only minimally increasing the energy efficiency of the home. Meanwhile, a Home Innovation Research Labs study revealed that it would require up to 90 years for a home buyer to realize a payback on the added upfront cost of the home.

...

Reduce local impact fees and other upfront taxes associated with housing construction. While some impact fees may be necessary to cover the costs of increased public services for new home developments, those fees must be imposed fairly with the cost to the home buyer in mind.

...

Make it easier for developers to finance new housing. Like home buyers seeking a mortgage, home builders and developers rely on banks for financing to build new homes and housing developments. Banks posted a decline in the volume of total outstanding acquisition, development and construction (AD&C) loans during the fourth quarter of 2023 as interest rates increased and financial conditions tightened. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks should be encouraged to support a secondary market for AD&C financing that would expand financing options so that builders can increase the housing supply.

Update employment policies to promote flexibility and opportunity.

...
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99109 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Overturn inefficient local zoning rules. Many local and state governments have adopted zoning laws that inhibit home construction and drive up costs. Inefficient land use policies make it harder and more expensive to build. Localities need to rework their zoning plans to increase density and allow more flexibility for developers. NAHB supports ideas such as reducing minimum lot sizes, allowing more accessory dwelling units, minimizing parking requirements and promoting missing middle housing (townhomes and duplexes). In addition, localities should consider a range of housing types, including multifamily; opening up areas where residential development has not been previously allowed; and prioritizing development around existing or planned transit stations. Accommodating these ideas can increase supply and lower overall housing costs.


frick this.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15776 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

quote:
Overturn inefficient local zoning rules. Many local and state governments have adopted zoning laws that inhibit home construction and drive up costs. Inefficient land use policies make it harder and more expensive to build. Localities need to rework their zoning plans to increase density and allow more flexibility for developers. NAHB supports ideas such as reducing minimum lot sizes, allowing more accessory dwelling units, minimizing parking requirements and promoting missing middle housing (townhomes and duplexes). In addition, localities should consider a range of housing types, including multifamily; opening up areas where residential development has not been previously allowed; and prioritizing development around existing or planned transit stations. Accommodating these ideas can increase supply and lower overall housing costs.


frick this.


There are ways to do this that wouldn't create unchecked higher density and unfettered growth. Planned Unit Developments would be one route that could implement higher density and with design requirements and other controls to maintain community standards.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11400 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 10:02 pm to
I don’t have to read this to sum it up - give houses to trans black women.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49029 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 10:04 pm to
These honestly sound bad for the most part. A lot of RENTAL talk rather than ownership talk, which I find interesting.

They want to build their own rental enterprises and get cheap doing it
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11401 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 10:40 pm to
Somewhat related to housing...anyone remember this:
House lawmakers have spent $1.4 million in federal money subsidizing their lodging and dining in Washington, DC — with several millionaire members among those bilking Americans for the funds.
A Democrat-led provision introduced to the House rules handbook in the 117th Congress provides members with $34,000 annually to pay for rentals, hotel stays and meals while going about their official duties in the nation’s capital, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51793 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:35 am to
This sounds like they want more high-density apartment communities across the country with little parking so people have to rely on public transit (see: New York). That feeling of so many people compressed into such a small area is why I don't live in New York.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17326 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:30 am to
overlooking the obvious, as usual

how could there possibly be a “nationwide shortage of roughly 1.5 million housing units” in a country where the largest population cohort is downsizing/moving into assisted living facilities/dying off, and subsequent generations have been having children at well below replacement rates for over four decades

if they were really serious about “taming shelter inflation” there’s a painfully obvious solution: reduce demand associated with population growth
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261480 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:40 am to
Zoning sucks. Allow single home owners to do with their property as they see fit.

Commercial operators, frick y'all. Stay out of residential areas.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57375 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Overturn inefficient local zoning rules. …
frick this.
Amen. See Houston if you want to see the results of this.

quote:

Planned Unit Developments would be one route that could implement higher density and with design requirements and other controls to maintain community standards.
No.
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18477 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:12 am to
Yep. PUDs and high density housing is what is necessary to control your community and decrease your home values.
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
932 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:28 am to
The whole reason I'm living in a house is because I'm tired of apartments.

Some loud doucher playing music at 2am next door. A crying baby etc. Higher crime, random weirdos over, not being able to modify the house/landscape/any of that

And I want to be LOUD myself but not up in other people's business about it. frick renting forever and triple frick high density living
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67198 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:19 am to
Based on those numbers, there would be no housing shortage had the Biden administration not reopened the border.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33196 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:22 am to
quote:

There are ways to do this that wouldn't create unchecked higher density and unfettered growth. Planned Unit Developments would be one route that could implement higher density and with design requirements and other controls to maintain community standards.


This was done about 6 years ago in our area. It’s a planned neighborhood that includes a small number of apartments, townhomes, entry level homes and high end, larger homes. It also has a senior citizens home and rec center.

I was hugely against this development when I heard about it and couldn’t see how such a development would blend with this community where surrounding neighborhoods’ homes started at $600k. I’m very happy to say that it hasn’t been an issue at all. It was billed and proven to be a beginning to end community with people just starting out through retirement.

The lower priced units are primarily filled with young adults and single parents who were recently divorced. The townhomes are primarily first time home owners. I do have to wonder if the reason it’s worked is because even the entry level apartments are relatively expensive and definitely not targeted to low income or section 8.
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
1974 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:07 am to
quote:

NAHB supports ideas such as reducing minimum lot sizes, allowing more accessory dwelling units, minimizing parking requirements and promoting missing middle housing (townhomes and duplexes).


no thanks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram