re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

quote:

---

The ball doesn’t need to hit him and it doesn’t need to be a perfect throw for it to be interference. If, by the angle, it hypothetically impedes the throw then he’s out. The botched actual throw doesn’t change that.
It was interference…..case settled. Let’s all get on with our day

---

I think what isn't even being considered by most is this, is the reason for the wild throw, the hesitation that most likely caused the throw and then, Bear not being able to catch the ball caused because he is clearly running inside of the runner path even at the point of the collision at his arrival at 1st. They ran into each other because of what? A bad throw.