- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:52 am to Forever
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:52 am to Forever
quote:
any good ump isn’t calling interference unless the runner is actually obstructing or attempting to obstruct the throwing lane ETA: this is how the rule is actually writte
Why are you so sure that it didn’t effect him fielding and throwing? Was there a bad throw? Did he hesitate when throwing? Think it all the way out. How can you be so sure that him illegally running outside of the batter-runner lane did not effect him throwing the ball?
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 11:53 am
0
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News