Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
22800 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to
I’m sorry but if the 1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line…. It’s an out.
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4751 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 11:58 am to
quote:

I’m sorry but if the 1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line…. It’s an out.


Holy shite. This is not the rule. The fielder can actually be called for obstruction in the scenario you provided.

Here is what the rule is about:

A batter runner who does not run in the running lane and interferes with the first baseman’s ability to field a throw will be called out for RLI. Beyond that, if contact is had, it has to be judged who initiated the contact, did the contact interfere with an additional play, was it malicious contact, etc. None of that had anything to do with RLI. Quit googling and try to get a better understanding of the rule book. I’d love to hear your interpretations on OBS.
Posted by SJHTIGER
down south
Member since Oct 2023
93 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line
The first baseman was drawn inside because of one of the worst throws i've ever seen...If Millazo makes a half decent throw the runner would be out by at least 2 steps and we would be celebrating a victory PERIOD. I don't fault Jones at all...was the runner inside..maybe a little. I cant argue the call I would have let it go too...Also if Herring hadnt lost all directions to where home plate and the strike zone were it would have never come down to this
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram