- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:29 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:29 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
The rule is designed to prevent anyone from being inside the foul line
The rule is designed to prevent interference, which wasn’t the case on that play. You can link some shitty Google AI breakdown all you want but any good ump isn’t calling interference unless the runner is actually obstructing or attempting to obstruct the throwing lane
ETA: this is how the rule is actually written in the NCAA rulebook.
NCAA 2-51 Interference
Interference SECTION 51.
The act of an offensive player, umpire or nongame person who interferes with; physically or verbally hinders; confuses; or impedes any fielder attempting to make a play
Nowhere does it say that you can’t run inside the line. Congrats on your first foray with Google AI answers giving you completely bad info and you falling for it with no further research
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 7:44 am
3
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:22 am to Forever
You are the person who is fooled. The rule clearly states you can not run on the left side of the foul line. Thanks for proving you know nothing about baseball. With that being stated, what a piss poor effort by this team. That is little league errors and shouldn’t be part of major college baseball. This team doesn’t deserve to win crap. Here’s to hoping for next year.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:52 am to Forever
quote:
any good ump isn’t calling interference unless the runner is actually obstructing or attempting to obstruct the throwing lane ETA: this is how the rule is actually writte
Why are you so sure that it didn’t effect him fielding and throwing? Was there a bad throw? Did he hesitate when throwing? Think it all the way out. How can you be so sure that him illegally running outside of the batter-runner lane did not effect him throwing the ball?
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 11:53 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News