re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Really neat pic. Thanks for the invigorating conversation!

quote:

---

You can’t possibly look at the picture in your post and think it resembles the Maryland play in any way.

---

I’m clearly talking over some of yalls heads. Either I’m not explaining things well or people on here have trouble juggling multivariate, nuanced arguments. Probably a bit of both.
We are unlikely to find another scenario with exactly the same factors and there are multiple facets to consider with this rule. It’s easier to find precedence for each specific factor.

Some people were arguing that the throw had to be accurate or on the line to be considered interference. The Maryland example shows that is clearly not the case. That’s all I was trying to say.
I think myself and others provided examples to make a case for why the circumstance of last night should have been called interference. You guys have every right to disagree. The reality is it doesn’t matter. Let’s move on and have a great day!

It’s a lot more egregious than the ones we’ve seen both for and against LSU. Specifically the one against UF early in Game 3.

But it was still a very makable play and I’m much more disappointed in Milazzo than the umps.