- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:38 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time
This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol
2
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:39 pm to hall59tiger
quote:He was no where near interfering with the throw through
This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol
The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it
Purple dot is Milazzo, red dot is gump. Please tell me there was interference to the throw. He has a wide arse open throwing lane
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm to lsupride87
I can’t believe this is still going. I wish there was a view from the third base line to show the angle of the throw. I don’t think people realize how far out from the plate he was.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm to MOT
I just posted an angle from first showing how open the bag was for the throw
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it
In the words of Hans Landa….”it’s a bingo”.
The throw was off because the runner was inside the baseline, therefore interfering with the throw. It doesn’t have to be a perfect throw to interfere.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:50 pm to lsupride87
quote:
just posted an angle from first showing how open the bag was for the throw
Now do the angle of the UF Game…..
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:52 pm to hall59tiger
quote:
The throw was off because the runner was inside the baseline, therefore interfering with the throw
Wait. So the runner being inside the baseline causes Milazzo to throw it further right?
Physics a tough class for you? This should cause Milazzo to yank it left….Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:54 pm to L S Usetheforce
Bitching about the officiating is a losers game. It’s done. Move on. Try to grow out of being a loser.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:56 pm to hall59tiger
quote:UF was called for interference because the player ran into Morgan without ever establishing himself back in the baseline. Proof is here
Now do the angle of the UF Game
Look at his last step before hitting Morgan. It’s still inside of the line
Compare that to the last THREE steps of bama player, all well established on the line
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:57 pm to lsupride87
Let me dumb this the fk down for you and your mouth breathing brothers and sisters. This will be my final post regarding this bc I'm wasting my time at this point.
#1 His last 3 steps weren't in the runners path.
#2 It doesn't fkn matter. At the 45' mark, a runners path is established by chalked lines the foul line and the runners path which 3' to the right. The lines are there for a reason. The don't just chalk them bc it looks pretty. The batter-runner at this point should be running between them the ENTIRE rest of the path to 1st base. That is the rule the runner must enter the path and continue to 1st base.
#3 The only exceptions are on balls not being field to 1st base and to avoid contact with the fielder.
The same circumstances have been widely covered in the last 2 CWS finals bc they were so important in the game's outcome.
This is from 2022 CWS and is the same fkn play with the exception of the LH pitcher making the throw and batter-runner virtually doing the same fkn route to 1st base.
OM OU CWS 2022
Here is an umpire explaining the rule so that maybe even idiots that act like they know what the fk they are talking about but don't even understand
Ted Barrett Explaining RI
#1 His last 3 steps weren't in the runners path.
#2 It doesn't fkn matter. At the 45' mark, a runners path is established by chalked lines the foul line and the runners path which 3' to the right. The lines are there for a reason. The don't just chalk them bc it looks pretty. The batter-runner at this point should be running between them the ENTIRE rest of the path to 1st base. That is the rule the runner must enter the path and continue to 1st base.
#3 The only exceptions are on balls not being field to 1st base and to avoid contact with the fielder.
quote:
NCAA Rule 7, Section 11 (p) : In running the last half of the distance from home plate to first base while the ball is being fielded to first base, the batter-runner runs outside the 3-foot restraining line or inside the foul line and, in so doing, interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, except that the batter may go outside these lines to avoid a fielder attempting to field a batted ball
The same circumstances have been widely covered in the last 2 CWS finals bc they were so important in the game's outcome.
This is from 2022 CWS and is the same fkn play with the exception of the LH pitcher making the throw and batter-runner virtually doing the same fkn route to 1st base.
OM OU CWS 2022
Here is an umpire explaining the rule so that maybe even idiots that act like they know what the fk they are talking about but don't even understand
Ted Barrett Explaining RI
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:00 pm to Le Tenia
quote:Except
#2 It doesn't fkn matter. At the 45' mark, a runners path is established by chalked lines the foul line and the runners path which 3' to the right. The lines are there for a reason. The don't just chalk them bc it looks pretty. The batter-runner at this point should be running between them the ENTIRE rest of the path to 1st base. That is the rule the runner must enter the path and continue to 1st base.
quote:
However, it is not required for the runner to be within the runners lane the entire time up to 1st base. The runner may enter the lane at the 50’ mark, the 60’ mark or even the 80’ mark as long as both feet have established themselves within the lane, and no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time.
So the 45’ rule does not matter if the runner re-establishes himself before the potential interference. It even states he can re enter at 80feet!
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:03 pm to lsupride87
He has to run the entire last 45' inside the lines you fkn idiot. I'm done with you
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:04 pm to Le Tenia
quote:Excelt he doesn’t. I can’t make it more clear
He has to run the entire last 45' inside the lines you fkn idiot. I'm done with you
quote:
The runner may enter the lane at the 50’ mark, the 60’ mark or even the 80’ mark as long as both feet have established themselves within the lane, and no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time
Read that very slowly. Read it three times
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:05 pm to lsupride87
Is that a written rule? Link it?
quote:
NCAA Rule 7, Section 11 (p) : In running the last half of the distance from home plate to first base while the ball is being fielded to first base, the batter-runner runs outside the 3-foot restraining line or inside the foul line and, in so doing, interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, except that the batter may go outside these lines to avoid a fielder attempting to field a batted ball
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:16 pm to Le Tenia
Which means he’s right handed. It’s what hand you throw not what hand the glove is on. Which is why left handed 1st baseman are defensively better.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:16 pm to Le Tenia
Correct. If they are outside of the line after 45 feet while interfering it’s an out
It’s very clearly written. You are trying to interpret the rule as “if outside of the baseline after 45 feet the runner is out.”
It’s very clearly written. You are trying to interpret the rule as “if outside of the baseline after 45 feet the runner is out.”
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:17 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
The rule is designed to prevent anyone from being inside the foul line. I’m sorry you don’t understand the rule but the runner should be starting his run to the right not the left. Omaha doesn’t give a shite about it. They call this at least 8 times a tournament
You are correct and what is even more frustrating is that this is a correctable call. The play is a walk off either way it is called. Interference ends the inning and LSU wins. That call could be made today because the call has a definitive end.
Dont hold your breath though... I have never seen a call overuled a day later and changed the outcome of the game...
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:20 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Wait. So the runner being inside the baseline causes Milazzo to throw it further right? Physics a tough class for you? This should cause Milazzo to yank it left….
I honestly never took physics and I probably wouldn’t have done very well if I’m honest. The good news is I was pretty good at geometry (which is actually what matters here lol)….and I was an even better tester when it came to logic and reason, neither of which seems to come all that natural to you.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:21 pm to Forever
quote:
That would be a joke of an interference call.
It actually wouldn’t. We’ve seen runners get called for being much closer to the baseline as recently as last year. I can’t remember which game….Wake Forest? Might’ve been one on the Florida games.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
If they are outside of the line after 45 feet while interfering it’s an out
Can we find a point to agree upon here? So, you will admit that, by the rule, at the very least the runners path could have been ruled interference?
The hanging point seems to be how we define “interfered” with the throw? As in did it interfere with his ABILITY to throw or did it interfere with the ACTUAL throw?
Page 6 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News