- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:01 pm to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:01 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:From a ball being thrown outside of the bag to the right
Bro there was a collision at first base.
An offline throw to the foul side of the bag with contact will never ever be called on the runner.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:02 pm
0
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:04 pm to Gee
quote:
That’s how my coaches taught me.
100% how most every player is taught. It is done so to make it tough on the fielders and puts the judgement on the umps to rule on it. Exactly why there's chalked lines and a clearly written rule with an exception to avoid contact. What should be the deciding factor is there is now replay to confirm the ump's judgement in deciding such cases. Last night there appeared to be a ruse of such replay.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:07 pm to L S Usetheforce
That’s not the rule the rule from the book has been posted 100 times since it happened the runner has to interfere with the throw…..clearly that never happened.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:10 pm to lsupride87
My reading is just fine. Can you comprehend what you're reading??
The rule clearly says that the runner must be in the runners path (the foul line and chalked line 3' to right that starts 45' from home and continues to the 1st base bag) all the way to 1st on a fielded play with exception to avoid contact with the fielder.
The rule clearly says that the runner must be in the runners path (the foul line and chalked line 3' to right that starts 45' from home and continues to the 1st base bag) all the way to 1st on a fielded play with exception to avoid contact with the fielder.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:12 pm to Le Tenia
quote:correct
The rule clearly says that the runner must be in the runners path (the foul line and chalked line 3' to right that starts 45' from home and continues to the 1st base bag) all the way to 1st on a fielded play with exception to avoid contact with the fielder.
And the rules then clearly states jf the runner is not doing so, it’s only interference if he actually interferes with the play….
So, according to the rule, you can run inside the line all you want as long as you don’t interfere with the play. It’s 100% written as such
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:12 pm to LSU316
quote:
LSU316
I'm out. Here come all the tards, the bell must have rung and they let them out. Where is Rutard the Rain Man?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:15 pm to Le Tenia
So bear is right handed first baseman not a lefty
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
And the rules then clearly states jf the runner is not doing so, it’s only interference if he actually interferes with the play….
So, according to the rule, you can run inside the line all you want as long as you don’t interfere with the play. It’s 100% written as such
Geez. How can you say that he did not interfere with the play?? Was there a play to 1st base or not?? Was he running in the fkn runner path or not?? Never mind.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:16 pm to Le Tenia
quote:Because he was not in the throwing lane at all. If Milazzo throws it directly at first base it’s an easy out
How can you say that he did not interfere with the play?? Was there a play to 1st base or not?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:16 pm to GeauxtigersMs36
RH thrower, LH glove
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Because he was not in the throwing lane at all. If Milazzo throws it directly at first base it’s an easy out
Does the rule discuss throwing lanes or angles?
Did Milazzo throw it "right" to 1st base? I'm not asking if the throw was perfect. Did he throw the ball to 1st and was the runner inside the foul line at the time the ball got there?
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:19 pm to Le Tenia
quote:If the throwing lane is wide fricking open as well as jones being able to field the ball is wide arse open, then where is the interference?
Does the rule discuss throwing lanes or angles?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
If the throwing lane is wide fricking open as well as jones being able to field the ball is wide arse open, then where is the interference?
Did Milazzo throw it "right" to 1st base? I'm not asking if the throw was perfect. Did he throw the ball to 1st and was the runner inside the foul line at the time the ball got there?
The runner is running right into Bear. The collision is fair territory
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:24 pm to lsupride87
And to make it even more clear
The runner re entered the lane before any contact with Jones. So, the contact at that point does not matter because there was no previous interference
Proof he had re-entered the lane before contact
[/img]
The rules are very clear here. The runner re-established himself in the lane before the collision. Try to deny it with the picture above. You can’t. You can be a man and admit you were wrong, or whine like a child
The runner re entered the lane before any contact with Jones. So, the contact at that point does not matter because there was no previous interference
quote:
However, it is not required for the runner to be within the runners lane the entire time up to 1st base. The runner may enter the lane at the 50’ mark, the 60’ mark or even the 80’ mark as long as both feet have established themselves within the lane, and no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time.
Proof he had re-entered the lane before contact
[/img] The rules are very clear here. The runner re-established himself in the lane before the collision. Try to deny it with the picture above. You can’t. You can be a man and admit you were wrong, or whine like a child
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:24 pm to lsupride87
Show the next step.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:27 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:stepping on the line again
Show the next step.
Left right left. Last steps
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:27 pm to MikeTheTiger11
Yes it is. We lost the game and we have to blame ourselves, but if the runner is making our catcher move to throw around him then it’s interference.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:30 pm to MrXYZ
quote:catcher simply fielded the ball hit towards the pitcher. He didn’t move around the runner
Yes it is. We lost the game and we have to blame ourselves, but if the runner is making our catcher move to throw around him then it’s interference.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:31 pm to L S Usetheforce
The runner takes one step in the lane and immediately runs out of it again.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:33 pm to Le Tenia
quote:
The runner takes one step in the lane and immediately runs out of it again.
This is the last three steps. All in the lane. Stepping directly on the line. You are a woman or a child
Left right left. Last steps
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:34 pm
Page 5 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News