- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:14 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:14 am
This gets called in Omaha on the regular
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 7:19 am
19
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:19 am to L S Usetheforce
Doesn’t matter because LSU should not have been in that situation in the first place. No excuses!
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:20 am to Bryno1960
Well rules do matter. Especially in game ending situations.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:23 am to L S Usetheforce
That would be a joke of an interference call. The rule has to have parameters in writing but Milazzo had a clear throw and tossed it into the parking lot. The runner was a step inside of the line still on the dirt, that isn’t what the rule is designed to prevent
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:23 am to L S Usetheforce
So where was he when the ball was actually being fielded at first. Because that pic isn’t the situation the rule is protecting against.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:25 am to L S Usetheforce
Yes, should have been called but it should not have come down to putting the game in the umps or replays hand.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:25 am to Forever
The rule is designed to prevent anyone from being inside the foul line. I’m sorry you don’t understand the rule but the runner should be starting his run to the right not the left. Omaha doesn’t give a shite about it. They call this at least 8 times a tournament
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:29 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
The rule is designed to prevent anyone from being inside the foul line
The rule is designed to prevent interference, which wasn’t the case on that play. You can link some shitty Google AI breakdown all you want but any good ump isn’t calling interference unless the runner is actually obstructing or attempting to obstruct the throwing lane
ETA: this is how the rule is actually written in the NCAA rulebook.
NCAA 2-51 Interference
Interference SECTION 51.
The act of an offensive player, umpire or nongame person who interferes with; physically or verbally hinders; confuses; or impedes any fielder attempting to make a play
Nowhere does it say that you can’t run inside the line. Congrats on your first foray with Google AI answers giving you completely bad info and you falling for it with no further research
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 7:44 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:53 am to Forever
quote:
That would be a joke of an interference call. The rule has to have parameters in writing but Milazzo had a clear throw and tossed it into the parking lot. The runner was a step inside of the line still on the dirt, that isn’t what the rule is designed to prevent
Every single part of the rule was broken BUT it is a judgement call. Jones was the one interfered with and not Milazzo
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:53 am to L S Usetheforce
Admit it...when LSU got 2 Outs they turned into The Island of Misfit Toys...
You had a Pitcher who can't throw a strike.
A Catcher who can't throw to 1st.
And a 1st Baseman who can't catch.
Other than that they should have won.
You had a Pitcher who can't throw a strike.
A Catcher who can't throw to 1st.
And a 1st Baseman who can't catch.
Other than that they should have won.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:56 am to JodyPlauche
All that may true but what does that have to do with incorrectly running to first?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:57 am to L S Usetheforce
Directly from your article:
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
quote:
Finally, not only must the runner be running illegally, but also he must interfere. A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:59 am to Forever
quote:
However, in the College World Series play the runner did contact the 1st baseman causing him to drop the ball
You forgot this part. He ran illegally and made contact with our 1st baseman. Easy out in Omaha
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:00 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:03 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:This is false.
The rule is designed to prevent anyone from being inside the foul line.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:04 am to MOT
It isn’t false there is some leeway to it. Like striding but if any ball comes at an angle to the 1st baseman and you are inside the foul line you will be called out. if you make contact with him.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:06 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:I’m sorry but it is. If the rule is to prevent people from running inside the line it would be called hundreds of times every week.
It isn’t false
ETA: From your own link
quote:
A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:08 am to JodyPlauche
quote:
You had a Pitcher who can't throw a strike. A Catcher who can't throw to 1st. And a 1st Baseman who can't catch.
What about a left fielder who can’t catch
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to MOT
I’m sorry but if the 1st baseman and the runner make contact and the person has run inside the foul line…. It’s an out.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am to MOT
No one is talking about the run. We are talking about the contact with the 1st baseman based off the run.
Page 1 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News