re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference

quote:

---

Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong. One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.

---

All of this is correct.

There’s the letter of the law and then the spirit of the law. There’s interference and then there’s interference.