Started By
Message

re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference

Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29318 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm to
Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong.

One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
9653 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong. One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without interference having to be called.


All of this is correct.

There’s the letter of the law and then the spirit of the law. There’s interference and then there’s interference.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram