- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:31 pm to LSU316
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:31 pm to LSU316
quote:
What is your opinion of where this might be….a 3in strip of white chalk?
It’s not n opinion. They caulk the field for a reason. The runners lane is there for a reason.
0
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:32 pm to Le Tenia
Never ceases to amaze me how many umpires that do and dont know the rules that post here. Lets just stick to being pro coaches TD.
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:34 pm to LSU316
quote:
Wait some dude said there was no “base path” but a “running lane”…..which is it?
You obviously know absolutely shite about baseball yet you want to argue. There is a batter/runner lane from home to first base. Look at the fkn screenshots
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:37 pm to LSU316
quote:
Got the official paragraph on that one because it sure does get overlooked a helluva lot at all levels of ball I watch.
Do your own research you lazy fk! Turnabout is fair play. LMAO
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:57 pm to josh336
I believe it could have easily been called interference based on the rule.
That said, I’m not dying on this particular hill because we absolutely blew that game.
That said, I’m not dying on this particular hill because we absolutely blew that game.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:20 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Not a single umpire anywhere ever is making that call unless it’s blatant.
That’s because most of the time the runner is thrown out at first anyway.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 4:51 am to josh336
quote:
He was inside the line
IF the runner was in fair territory he should have been ruled out -
the runner MUST stay in foul territory - within a narrow lane defined by the lanes drawn in foul territory.
ANY play from 'behind the runner' going to first base, the runner MUST say in foul territory until he touches the bag.
Didn't see the play - but from the commentary I have read the above seems to me to be the situation.
it sounds like the throw to first base was to the right of the bag - if so - no way to legally make the play without being called for interference.
From all the commentary - it sounds like the runner may have interfered with the play IF he put one foot into fair territory in the last 1/3 of the path to first.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 4:57 am to lsupride87
quote:
If Milazzo throws the ball at first base the runner is no where near the ball
Milazzo threw it horrifically right and the RUNNER STILL DIDNT GET IN THE WAY OF THE BALL
The runner didn’t interfere with the throw, the line is irrelevant
if /\ THIS /\ is anywhere near accurate - and from all that I have read so far, this is the image that is coming to my mind - then everyone blasting Jones for not catching the ball is just plain STUPID.
From the git-go on reading about this this morning, I assumed the ball was throw too far to the right of the first base bag - clearly making it IMPOSSIBLE to made a legal play by the first baseman.
Sounds like there are a bunch of IDIOTs claiming = "Jones should have used his 250 lb to mix it up with the runner"
/\ THAT /\ would have been even dumber than not bothering to touch 3rd base on the way to the plate.
good grief at the stupidity on this board
Posted on 5/11/24 at 5:15 am to josh336
quote:
Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Very easy. It’s not interference if a runner is inside the baseline unless the ball hits him. The ball clearly did not hit him so it’s not interference just a terrible throw by the catcher on an unfortunate series of at bats by Alabama.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 5:15 am to josh336
Great thread 
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:09 am to josh336
It's a shitty rule but that is textbook interference.
A lot of dumbasses in here don't know ball.
Well no shite, the runner was inside the baseline blocking Milazzo's throwing path to Bear
Yes, inside the foul line and stayed straight inside the line the whole way (where he's not suppposed to be)
Did Jay even make the argument tho? Seems like it would be a pretty easy overturn and TIGERS WIN TIGERS WIN
A lot of dumbasses in here don't know ball.
quote:
The throw sucked arse
Well no shite, the runner was inside the baseline blocking Milazzo's throwing path to Bear
quote:
the runner ran in a straight line
Yes, inside the foul line and stayed straight inside the line the whole way (where he's not suppposed to be)
Did Jay even make the argument tho? Seems like it would be a pretty easy overturn and TIGERS WIN TIGERS WIN
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 6:13 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:13 am to Honkus
If the ball was right in front of the plate, you may could have an argument for interference. The ball was thrown from damn near the pitcher’s mound. Just a pussy arse throw.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:16 am to Allthatfades
quote:
the ball was right in front of the plate, you may could have an argument for interference
That doesn't matter. If he is inside the baseline and interferes with the 1Bs attempt to catch the ball it's runners interference and he's out.
He was clearly obstructing the throwing lane to where Alex.had to throw behind the runner to make a play
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:23 am to Honkus
horrible no call by the ump
edit, here is the rule SIAP
In college, runner's lane interference can be called if a batter-runner's failure to run within the runner's lane interferes with the thrower: "If the batter-runner is running illegally to first base and his being outside the lane alters the throw of a fielder, hinders or alters a fielder’s opportunity to field the throw, or the batter-runner is hit by the throw that has been made in an attempt to make a play, it shall be called interference and the batter-runner is to be called out" (NCAA 7-11-p AR 1).
bold part is the rule
LINK
edit, here is the rule SIAP
In college, runner's lane interference can be called if a batter-runner's failure to run within the runner's lane interferes with the thrower: "If the batter-runner is running illegally to first base and his being outside the lane alters the throw of a fielder, hinders or alters a fielder’s opportunity to field the throw, or the batter-runner is hit by the throw that has been made in an attempt to make a play, it shall be called interference and the batter-runner is to be called out" (NCAA 7-11-p AR 1).
bold part is the rule
LINK
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 6:27 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:34 am to catholictigerfan
I don't know how he altered the throw to be honest. Hell, he threw it poorly far to the right of the bag, when the easy play was throw it to the 2nd base side of the bag. Was an easy throw that he rushed, and it ended up costing us the game.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:35 am to catholictigerfan
Thanks catlic
DING
DING
DING
it's interesting that Bama doesn't have box for the runners lane near first base
quote:
If the batter-runner is running illegally to first base
DING
quote:
his being outside the lane alters the throw of a fielder,
DING
quote:
hinders or alters a fielder’s opportunity to field the throw,
DING
it's interesting that Bama doesn't have box for the runners lane near first base
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:43 am to josh336
It’s hilarious of many of you don’t know the rules. Then again what do I expect from the rant.
It was 100 percent interference regardless of your feelings on the game little rant babies
It was 100 percent interference regardless of your feelings on the game little rant babies
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:46 am to LSU1SLU
Bingo! It’s interference but can’t be overturned because the Gumps just spent so much money on that light show.
Another thing I noticed this morning is that it was actually a foul ball. That’s why Milazzo is slow to grab the ball and running with his hands up.
Ball bounces on the left side behind the plate then rolls forward. Even more proof that Birmingham didn’t take a look at the play
Edit: rewatched without sleep in my eyes, not foul but definitely interference
Another thing I noticed this morning is that it was actually a foul ball. That’s why Milazzo is slow to grab the ball and running with his hands up.
Ball bounces on the left side behind the plate then rolls forward. Even more proof that Birmingham didn’t take a look at the play
Edit: rewatched without sleep in my eyes, not foul but definitely interference
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 7:12 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 6:54 am to Urca de Lima
Imagine you're Alex, after busting your arse to get to the ball you look up and see this
It's perfectly clear why he yanked the throw. I guess he should have just hit the runner square in the back and not left it up to the Ump's/Birmingham's judgement or interpretation of the rule
It's perfectly clear why he yanked the throw. I guess he should have just hit the runner square in the back and not left it up to the Ump's/Birmingham's judgement or interpretation of the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:05 am to rphtiger
quote:not the same rule as MLB OR HIGH School. He doesn’t have to be able to catch it. Jones could have been worried about the collision and not be able to see.
Because the throw sucked arse and bear can’t catch
Page 7 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News