re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference

It doesn’t help your cause when the ball is thrown damn near in the dugout from the mound

quote:

---

josh336

---

For someone that loves to talk baseball you sure don’t know much about it

Im not talking about a terrible throw, stick to the topic

Not interference dude was in the base path balm was thrown 4’ outside of that said path

quote:

---

The catcher throwing a piss poor throw to first. Runner is allowed to run a straight line.

---

Not inside the base line. Not 1 fricking inch.
Still on millazo but that was totally runner's interference by rule and definition

Problem is you walk a batter then hit one. Free bases. Let them hit it and and let defense work

Well it was a judgement call that could have went either way…..if the throw would have been on line and it hit the runner as he was running into Jones it may have been called….with such a piss poor throw it’s easier to not call interference.

quote:

---

Im not talking about a terrible throw, stick to the topic

---

The runner was running directly on the baseline the entire time and never deviated from it. The terrible throw inside that makes jones have to throw his body right into the runner doesn’t make it interrence on the runner

quote:

---

For someone that loves to talk baseball you sure don’t know much about it

---

Well he knows that rule lol.

quote:

---

Once again. Not a prerequisite for interference.

---

There’s interference and then there’s interference. He didn’t impede the throw. fricking Milazzo almost hit him with the ball regardless if he was inside the line or not. It was a shitty throw by OUR catcher. Not interference by the baserunner.