re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference

It’s a letter of law vs intent of law situation there and can go either way…..if you watch a lot of baseball you’ve seen that not called more than it’s called most likely.

Now somebody said earlier he was on the infield grass at one point which makes it a more egregious no call…..but based on that still shot even though by letter of law it could be called it should surprise no one that it’s not.