re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

quote:

---

At 40 million a year he has no value

---

No value is a little strong, but yes you are correct that his value is greatly diminished with that contract. Him on Murray’s contract would be a no-brainer.

Would we really be that much better off paying Garland $164 million the next 4 years over paying CJ $63 million the next two?

Based on contracts and cost of acquisition, for me I’d rank them:

Murray


Garland
Trae