- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:36 am to TigerinATL
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:36 am to TigerinATL
Lauri
Clarkson
Kessler
Sexton
Collins
#10
In that order. Collins is the only one that doesn't make sense. Yes it gives us great depth/ scheming but does not fill any voids + is a hefty price while not doing so.
It would only make sense to take Collina if we add both Kessler/ Sexton.
Otherwise i'd rather a combo of Clarkson/ Kessler or Lauri/ Sexton
Clarkson
Kessler
Sexton
Collins
#10
In that order. Collins is the only one that doesn't make sense. Yes it gives us great depth/ scheming but does not fill any voids + is a hefty price while not doing so.
It would only make sense to take Collina if we add both Kessler/ Sexton.
Otherwise i'd rather a combo of Clarkson/ Kessler or Lauri/ Sexton
3
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:40 am to Dantheman504
Here's how I would order it
Inefficient checkers who don't really have any other skills that they are really good at are always losing players.
We were talking about this the other day with the likes of Clarkson/Cam THomas/Oubre/Kuzma...think of any dude who fits that mold, go to BRef and check his career On/Off numbers...it's almost guaranteed to be negative, and for their careers, their respective teams are better when they are off the court. Clarkson is firmly in that tier.
I'd have zero interest at all, but in general, would view him as a negative asset and I'd need some other asset coming with him and giving back junk to even consider it...but not for this team, he would just be a hard no.
quote:
Lauri
Kessler
Sexton
Collins
#10
Not Clarkson, even if he were free
Inefficient checkers who don't really have any other skills that they are really good at are always losing players.
We were talking about this the other day with the likes of Clarkson/Cam THomas/Oubre/Kuzma...think of any dude who fits that mold, go to BRef and check his career On/Off numbers...it's almost guaranteed to be negative, and for their careers, their respective teams are better when they are off the court. Clarkson is firmly in that tier.
I'd have zero interest at all, but in general, would view him as a negative asset and I'd need some other asset coming with him and giving back junk to even consider it...but not for this team, he would just be a hard no.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 10:42 am
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:43 am to Dantheman504
Collins is in it for salary purposes.
Lauri is probably unattainable for us, for what Ainge would want. I'd love Lauri, but I think Ainge would trade rape anyone that was able to pry him away.
Lauri is probably unattainable for us, for what Ainge would want. I'd love Lauri, but I think Ainge would trade rape anyone that was able to pry him away.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 11:08 am to Dantheman504
I think we have (2) markets right now:
Immediate impact trades:
Cavs (Mitchell/ Allen/ Garland)
Hawks (Murray/ Trae/ OO)
Jazz (Clarkson/ Lauri/ Kessler/ Sexton)
And then your "long term plan/ short term rebuild"
Magic
Heat
Pistons
Blazers
Houston
Spurs
Wizards
Hornets
I personally can see good trade packages between Houston/ Portland/ Charlotte but that doesn't mean they will do it.
The other market is the big ???
GSW
Boston
Min
Philly
I just don't see that working out without a major trade happening KAT/ Brown/ Embiid/. And I'm not sure if that's the move unless you are getting Edwards/ Maxey pending on how much you are giving up.
Immediate impact trades:
Cavs (Mitchell/ Allen/ Garland)
Hawks (Murray/ Trae/ OO)
Jazz (Clarkson/ Lauri/ Kessler/ Sexton)
And then your "long term plan/ short term rebuild"
Magic
Heat
Pistons
Blazers
Houston
Spurs
Wizards
Hornets
I personally can see good trade packages between Houston/ Portland/ Charlotte but that doesn't mean they will do it.
The other market is the big ???
GSW
Boston
Min
Philly
I just don't see that working out without a major trade happening KAT/ Brown/ Embiid/. And I'm not sure if that's the move unless you are getting Edwards/ Maxey pending on how much you are giving up.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 11:09 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News