- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:13 pm to TigerintheNO
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:13 pm to TigerintheNO
They going to buy us lunch before they try to frick us?
0
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:19 pm to TigerintheNO
Swap moody for kuminga. Add podziemskj
Moody is legitimately nothing more than a bench player.
Not selling a dollar for 50 cents. Thats just asinine and stupid. You want a legit #2, you ain't gonna get him for nothing.
Moody is legitimately nothing more than a bench player.
Not selling a dollar for 50 cents. Thats just asinine and stupid. You want a legit #2, you ain't gonna get him for nothing.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:20 pm to htran90
Yea that’s a horrible trade. Who comes up with this shite and has a job.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:22 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Yea that’s a horrible trade. Who comes up with this shite and has a job.
Probably bandwagon fans who used to cheer for the Lakers TBH.
It would be like the Bulls trying to trade the corpse of Lonzo for Trey and some very distant firsts.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:46 pm to teke184
Klutch didn’t even wait for the game to be over before they were dropping Garland trade bombs.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 10:48 pm to Fun Bunch
As RealGM put it, if Cleveland sees Mitchell as the future, Garland’s arse is getting shipped somewhere regardless of his demands.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 11:00 pm to teke184
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Feels like you can get JA for free if he’s upsetting the org.
Posted on 5/15/24 at 11:14 pm to duyp
quote:
Feels like you can get JA for free if he’s upsetting the org.
This kind of scares me seems like something BI would do.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 5:55 am to Pels_Yaz
Atlanta is apparently monitoring Mitchell to see if he doesn’t sign an extension and they would then change course and try to pair Mitchell and Trae together.
Who would say no first?
Cavs: Ingram, Okongwu, Daniels
Hawks: Mitchell, Nance
Pels: Murray, Hunter, Allen #1 pick
Cavs stay very competitive, get a guy that should be able to play the 4 with Mobley at the 5, a big wing in DD
Pels get Murray after missing on Trae, but get to keep Herb, get a longtime target in Allen, and the #1 pick. In return for that we have to take a bad contract in Hunter, but with a lesser role on a team already loaded at the wing we could possibly keep him healthy with less minutes and rehab his value.
Hawks get Mitchell
We would obviously have to add a couple picks to this, but not sure how many
Who would say no first?
Cavs: Ingram, Okongwu, Daniels
Hawks: Mitchell, Nance
Pels: Murray, Hunter, Allen #1 pick
Cavs stay very competitive, get a guy that should be able to play the 4 with Mobley at the 5, a big wing in DD
Pels get Murray after missing on Trae, but get to keep Herb, get a longtime target in Allen, and the #1 pick. In return for that we have to take a bad contract in Hunter, but with a lesser role on a team already loaded at the wing we could possibly keep him healthy with less minutes and rehab his value.
Hawks get Mitchell
We would obviously have to add a couple picks to this, but not sure how many
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 5:56 am
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:18 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Pels get Murray after missing on Trae
I think we can call this "Pels get Murry (and celebrate that we didn't get Trae)"
quote:
Atlanta is apparently monitoring Mitchell to see if he doesn’t sign an extension and they would then change course and try to pair Mitchell and Trae together.
This would be such a disaster I'd probably watch some Hawks games
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think we can call this "Pels get Murry (and celebrate that we didn't get Trae)"
Trae is a far better player than Murray, and would fit this team better than Murray
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:47 am to Soggymoss
Any particular reason DD is included?
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:48 am to Soggymoss
Hawks says no. That's a massive overpay for Mitchell. They loose ALOT of good players and the number 1 pick.
Basically for them they loose OO, Hunter, Murray, and the number 1 pick for Mitchell and Nance LMAO.
Basically for them they loose OO, Hunter, Murray, and the number 1 pick for Mitchell and Nance LMAO.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:51 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Any particular reason DD is included?
Salary matching along with having to give up good players to make this deal.
No way we can only give up Ingram and Nance and get back Allen, Murray and the #1 pick
Posted on 5/16/24 at 6:52 am to Honest Man
quote:
That's a massive overpay for Mitchell. They loose ALOT of good players and the number 1 pick.
It’s definitely not a massive overpay for Mitchell, they give up no future assets and and only lose Murray, who Mitchell takes his spot anyway, and Okongwu. Hunter is a salary throw in that’s considered a negative contract right now due to his extensive injuries
So basically Atlanta’s end is sending out Murray, Okongwu and a bad contract along with one pick for Mitchell. That’s practically a steal.
If anyone says no I think it would be the Cavs
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 6:54 am
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:19 am to Soggymoss
That trade just doesn’t balance for me but I can’t put my finger on what needs to change. On the surface it feels like the Pels get too much value, but that’s from quantity, not quality.
I can see a deal going down between these 3 teams though. They are all in similar positions of having something the other wants, but that something is depressed in value, and external pressures are forcing them all to sell now.
I can see a deal going down between these 3 teams though. They are all in similar positions of having something the other wants, but that something is depressed in value, and external pressures are forcing them all to sell now.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:38 am to TigerinATL
Part of it is the psychology of the #1 pick. It feels more valuable than it is this year.
However, I do sorta agree. That trade is just off.
I’d rather the 1 go to someone else that wants it, we get a different pick, keep Dyson, and the team that got 1 gives the hawks or whomever a young player they want.
However, I do sorta agree. That trade is just off.
I’d rather the 1 go to someone else that wants it, we get a different pick, keep Dyson, and the team that got 1 gives the hawks or whomever a young player they want.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:51 am to TigerinATL
Yeah, the more I look at it the more it seems something else needs to be added, but at the same time I look at this draft and see the #1 pick as the #6 pick in a normal draft.
Maybe Wizards sending Kispert to Cavs and swapping #2 for #1, then #2 going to Pels?
Or maybe swapping Dyson for Herb?
Hard to pin down
Maybe Wizards sending Kispert to Cavs and swapping #2 for #1, then #2 going to Pels?
Or maybe swapping Dyson for Herb?
Hard to pin down
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 8:54 am
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:57 am to Fun Bunch
Genuinely believe Cavs have distressed assets now and the Pelicans should be going all hands on deck while the pain is still new.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:08 am to Soggymoss
Is the tier separation at the top high enough for the Wiz to move up a spot to ensure they get their guy?
If they see 2-3 guys as about co-equal, there isn’t a big point to moving up a spot and giving up Kispert, who they see as an asset.
If they see 2-3 guys as about co-equal, there isn’t a big point to moving up a spot and giving up Kispert, who they see as an asset.
Page 14 of 47
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News