Started By
Message

5 minutes into this mornings Stormy Daniels cross and Judge Merchan is working mighty hard

Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94992 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am



This piece of shite won't even allow her own words that counter her testimony to be entered.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74784 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:53 am to
So Orange didnt hook up with her

This is so embarrassing for the TDS clown crew
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79574 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:53 am to
The reckoning will come
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
5452 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:55 am to
Kangaroo gonna Kangaroo
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10586 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:57 am to
So trump didn’t have sex with her?

Huh?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99640 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 9:38 am to
What the ever loving frick?

She testified...under oath...that they had the affair.

There is zero basis to sustain an objection of impeachment evidence that is the witness' own fricking prior statements.

This jackass judge knows any conviction is going to get tossed, but he just doesn't fricking care.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 9:43 am
Posted by UFMatt
In Traitor Joe Biden's US
Member since Oct 2010
11574 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:33 am to
Layer after layer of reasons why this will be thrown out on appeal.

Crooked judges are a threat to our justice system. He should be disbarred and tried for treason along with anyone involved in the prosecution of this election interference sham. They may not know it but a day of reconning is coming. The first year of Trump's presidency will be a roundup of traitors, illegals, threats to our democracy. It can't happen soon enough.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46611 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:02 am to
Hopefully Trump's lawyers were smart enough to reference the date Stormy made that statement and list a few news outlets that reported on that statement. Force the jury to hear the truth.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5273 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:17 am to
So this judge allows non-probative evidence that's highly prejudicial but won't allow cross to enter evidence as rebuttal?

What kind of trial is this?


Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25063 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:33 am to
I have not followed this that closely, but this is pretty egregious and blatant from the judge. Assuming there are at least a couple of jurors that are somewhat neutral fair-minded and intelligent (hopefully Trump's team was able to get a couple that weren't in the bag for the prosecution) don't you think they will easily see what the judge is doing to the point that it will actually help Trump with those jurors? Sometimes a judge blatantly favoring one side over the other and not allowing the jurors to hear what is clearly relevant, important, and admissible can be counterproductive to what the judge thinks he is doing.

Defense: You said this yesterday, but there is sworn testimony and previous statements where you said the opposite, let's look at those previous statements so you can tell us which time you were lying.

Judge: No, I'm not going to allow the jury to see that.

Jury: What the frick - I want to see this information and figure out if this witness is lying to us.

Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12709 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:42 am to
Regardless of whether the affair happened or not, that is certainly a legitimate question to ask on cross examination. The judge’s disallowing it just gives Trump more ammunition for an appeal.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
2026 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:02 pm to
Its clear the Judge is acting as though he has nothing to lose by being as outwardly contempt as he can be, So, Stormy is allowed to testify to to Trumps sleeping arrangement with his own wife, but she cant be asked to testify to her own statements made and published.
Posted by HoopsAurora
Member since Apr 2024
190 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:16 pm to
He needs to be disbarred and brought up on charges.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15534 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to
If the pointless testimony about spanking with a magazine wasn’t bad enough of an error . . .

First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?

Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence

I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
Posted by MaxXL
Miami
Member since Feb 2024
144 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:37 pm to
If people actually knew what a "shark" "that senses blood in the water for money" that Whorme Sexiels is, then people would see her for what she is. She is a snake in the grass.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36355 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:51 pm to
Most lawyers absolutely love this. They're oozing with conceit and literally believe they're better humans than blue collar folks without any education beyond high school. 80% of my law school class were absolute douchebags. Do we honestly believe the "moderate" lawyers on this board object to this? Of course not. They preach about "democracy" and "the rule of law" and yet are perfectly fine with a judge doing things like this when his daughter is literally making a fortune off of Democratic clients.
Posted by Electricboogaloo2
Member since Mar 2024
95 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:23 pm to
When judge makes orange man happy, we say, “justice!”

When judge makes orange man sad, we say, “corruption!”
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19760 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:28 pm to
This Judge is gonna lose it, send Trump to jail for contempt and guarantee the Donald a win
Posted by Datbawwwww
Member since Oct 2023
350 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 2:25 pm to
With having 2 lawyers on the jury, I wonder if it will help the jury understand how outrageous this judges antics are?
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24863 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Trump's lawyer Necheles: Here's your tweet, "Making me the best person to flush the orange turd down."

Daniels: It doesn't say Trump, just orange turd. If you want to interpret it that way...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram