- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
5 minutes into this mornings Stormy Daniels cross and Judge Merchan is working mighty hard
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am
This piece of shite won't even allow her own words that counter her testimony to be entered.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:53 am to Lsuhoohoo
So Orange didnt hook up with her
This is so embarrassing for the TDS clown crew
This is so embarrassing for the TDS clown crew
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:57 am to Lsuhoohoo
So trump didn’t have sex with her?
Huh?
Huh?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 9:38 am to Lsuhoohoo
What the ever loving frick?
She testified...under oath...that they had the affair.
There is zero basis to sustain an objection of impeachment evidence that is the witness' own fricking prior statements.
This jackass judge knows any conviction is going to get tossed, but he just doesn't fricking care.
She testified...under oath...that they had the affair.
There is zero basis to sustain an objection of impeachment evidence that is the witness' own fricking prior statements.
This jackass judge knows any conviction is going to get tossed, but he just doesn't fricking care.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 9:43 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:33 am to Lsuhoohoo
Layer after layer of reasons why this will be thrown out on appeal.
Crooked judges are a threat to our justice system. He should be disbarred and tried for treason along with anyone involved in the prosecution of this election interference sham. They may not know it but a day of reconning is coming. The first year of Trump's presidency will be a roundup of traitors, illegals, threats to our democracy. It can't happen soon enough.
Crooked judges are a threat to our justice system. He should be disbarred and tried for treason along with anyone involved in the prosecution of this election interference sham. They may not know it but a day of reconning is coming. The first year of Trump's presidency will be a roundup of traitors, illegals, threats to our democracy. It can't happen soon enough.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:02 am to Lsuhoohoo
Hopefully Trump's lawyers were smart enough to reference the date Stormy made that statement and list a few news outlets that reported on that statement. Force the jury to hear the truth.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:17 am to Lsuhoohoo
So this judge allows non-probative evidence that's highly prejudicial but won't allow cross to enter evidence as rebuttal?
What kind of trial is this?
What kind of trial is this?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:33 am to Lsuhoohoo
I have not followed this that closely, but this is pretty egregious and blatant from the judge. Assuming there are at least a couple of jurors that are somewhat neutral fair-minded and intelligent (hopefully Trump's team was able to get a couple that weren't in the bag for the prosecution) don't you think they will easily see what the judge is doing to the point that it will actually help Trump with those jurors? Sometimes a judge blatantly favoring one side over the other and not allowing the jurors to hear what is clearly relevant, important, and admissible can be counterproductive to what the judge thinks he is doing.
Defense: You said this yesterday, but there is sworn testimony and previous statements where you said the opposite, let's look at those previous statements so you can tell us which time you were lying.
Judge: No, I'm not going to allow the jury to see that.
Jury: What the frick - I want to see this information and figure out if this witness is lying to us.
Defense: You said this yesterday, but there is sworn testimony and previous statements where you said the opposite, let's look at those previous statements so you can tell us which time you were lying.
Judge: No, I'm not going to allow the jury to see that.
Jury: What the frick - I want to see this information and figure out if this witness is lying to us.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:42 am to Lsuhoohoo
Regardless of whether the affair happened or not, that is certainly a legitimate question to ask on cross examination. The judge’s disallowing it just gives Trump more ammunition for an appeal.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:02 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Its clear the Judge is acting as though he has nothing to lose by being as outwardly contempt as he can be, So, Stormy is allowed to testify to to Trumps sleeping arrangement with his own wife, but she cant be asked to testify to her own statements made and published.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:16 pm to Lsuhoohoo
He needs to be disbarred and brought up on charges.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:26 pm to Lsuhoohoo
If the pointless testimony about spanking with a magazine wasn’t bad enough of an error . . .
First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?
Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
First step of impeachment is to call a prior inconsistent statement to the attention of a witness, and then to give them a chance to deny/or ask them if they remember?
Second step is to show them the inconsistent statement and then ask for it to be introduced into evidence
I’m not sure exactly sure WTAF the objection would be? This is basic cross-examination
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:37 pm to Lsuhoohoo
If people actually knew what a "shark" "that senses blood in the water for money" that Whorme Sexiels is, then people would see her for what she is. She is a snake in the grass.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:51 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Most lawyers absolutely love this. They're oozing with conceit and literally believe they're better humans than blue collar folks without any education beyond high school. 80% of my law school class were absolute douchebags. Do we honestly believe the "moderate" lawyers on this board object to this? Of course not. They preach about "democracy" and "the rule of law" and yet are perfectly fine with a judge doing things like this when his daughter is literally making a fortune off of Democratic clients.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:23 pm to Lsuhoohoo
When judge makes orange man happy, we say, “justice!”
When judge makes orange man sad, we say, “corruption!”
When judge makes orange man sad, we say, “corruption!”
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:28 pm to Lsuhoohoo
This Judge is gonna lose it, send Trump to jail for contempt and guarantee the Donald a win
Posted on 5/9/24 at 2:25 pm to Lsuhoohoo
With having 2 lawyers on the jury, I wonder if it will help the jury understand how outrageous this judges antics are?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:57 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Trump's lawyer Necheles: Here's your tweet, "Making me the best person to flush the orange turd down."
Daniels: It doesn't say Trump, just orange turd. If you want to interpret it that way...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News