- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GA State Election Board refuses to refer 140 election violations by fulton co to state AG
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:01 pm to riverdiver
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:01 pm to riverdiver
quote:
Because the powers to be refuse to investigate?
Nobody has to investigate. Nothing is stopping any of them from turning over all their evidence to the media today or holding a press conference showing up with a binder full of information. Why won't they do this?
0
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:02 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Trump didn’t find fraud
Not only did he not find it he paid 1.5 million to not find it. I'd call that incompetent. Wouldn't you?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:06 pm to ronricks
quote:
Is this part of the Biden is going to be removed by Military coup and Trump inserted type thing
Good lord. Yet another straw man.
quote:
I'll ask again, what result are you wanting?
Fraud proven. Those responsible held accountable.
quote:
There was all this proof yet instead of someone anyone holding a press conference showing the evidence people keep taking plea deals or making out of court settlements. Make this make sense to me?
Why don’t we let the court cases play themselves out before you start declaring victory.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:06 pm to ronricks
quote:
You are projecting again.
Liberals, like you, project. Everyone knows that.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:06 pm to ronricks
I’d call your mother a whore.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:07 pm to ronricks
quote:
So Trump didn't pay him and another firm to investigate? It was all a lie?
Let’s see the results of the investigation. Not what someone told the Post. Let’s see the actual results. What’s that…they were never released? Odd. Surely Smith has them, right. Can you please link to him producing them? TIA
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:08 pm to ronricks
quote:
Not only did he not find it he paid 1.5 million to not find it. I'd call that incompetent. Wouldn't you?
I don’t know and neither do you. Perhaps he was paid twice that amount to lose it. Regardless why do you think an incompetent could prove fraud didn’t occur?
And he very clearly qualified his statement by saying he didn’t find the fraud he was asked to find. but if you actually read his statement it sounds to me like he found fraud.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:09 pm to ronricks
quote:
The irony.
Misuse of irony. You dumb idiot
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:10 pm to ronricks
quote:
It doesn't get anymore clear than that.
Perfect. Post the records.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Perfect. Post the records.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:14 pm to ronricks
quote:
Wut? We covered this weeks ago on here. Jeff Fulgham is not an official and he has zero power nor is he part of any legal body or elected body. He is a guy who claims he is an "investigator" who is posting shite on Twitter. Anyone can do that. Please tell me you understand this? It would be no different than 'Sundance' from Conservative Treehouse posting this info on Twitter.
Holy frick, you're so behind, you think you're in the lead. At least the other addled, waterhead babies are on to "It's time to move on from 2020 and focus on 2024"
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:17 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:21 pm to ronricks
quote:
Violations does not = fraud.
You and your kind are living proof of "Whatever it takes. By any means necessary."
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:37 pm to ronricks
Just a few questions:
Where are the actual ballots now? (Ie all cast ballots)
Was there evidence of more ballots scanned than currently in possession of the board of elections
If 1 and 2 are not complete you agree that the laws have been violated ?
Where are the actual ballots now? (Ie all cast ballots)
Was there evidence of more ballots scanned than currently in possession of the board of elections
If 1 and 2 are not complete you agree that the laws have been violated ?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:44 pm to dafif
quote:
If 1 and 2 are not complete you agree that the laws have been violated ?
According to him that does not indicate fraud.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:00 pm to TDTOM
It may not be fraud but certainly crimes that changed the outcome of the election
Is that a distinction without a difference??
Is that a distinction without a difference??
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:37 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Let’s see the results of the investigation.
Trump has the results. Wonder why he didn’t release them? I mean why not?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:42 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
And he very clearly qualified his statement by saying he didn’t find the fraud he was asked to find. but if you actually read his statement it sounds to me like he found fraud.
Trump had the results as he is the one who commissioned the investigation. The guy who did the investigation said he found no fraud of what his client asked but you think Trump has evidence from this investigation and hasn’t released it yet?
You people are clinging onto straws at this point. He said he invested the fraud that his client Donald Trump asked him to investigate and he found no evidence of fraud. This isn’t some conspiracy. It happened.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:45 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Holy frick, you're so behind
Speaking of behind it’s May of 2024. There’s an election in 6 months. You are claiming we are now at bullet point number 4 of 8 listed. When do ‘we’ get to #8? May of 2028?
But I’m so behind? Really? What a time to be alive.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:56 pm to ronricks
quote:
Trump has evidence from this investigation and hasn’t released it yet?
I never said this so not sure why you need to straw man? Oh wait, I do know why you need to straw man. But I digress, your entire proof of no fraud is someone who seems to indicate there was in fact actual fraud.
You’re not very good at this.
Although I have to admit I never understood why Lin Wood and Sydney Power so vociferously claimed to have proof of fraud when they didn’t. The way you are using their “lack of proof” as “proof of no fraud” connects a lot of dots for me. I wonder what island beach they have retired to?
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News