- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More smoke on Dominion situation
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:44 am to Steadyhands
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:44 am to Steadyhands
quote:
This is essentially what I asked and he avoided.
I clarified my hyperbolic statement.
0
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:44 am to ronricks
quote:
hen you don't work for a Fortune 500 company or any large corporation.
So, you jumped on that argument... now address this: Why they would have remote access during the election to the machines?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:44 am to ronricks
quote:
There isn't a company in America that doesn't have Chinese employees
Definitely a chink in the armor.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:45 am to barbapapa
RonRicks with his terminal state 4 TDS still believes.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:45 am to therick711
quote:
He has now denied that, but it was asserted by implication in the post I responded to.
Nowhere did I say Dominion was a Fortune 500 company.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:46 am to BBONDS25
Yall just gonna let him slide by without answering why the CEO of dominion felt it was necessary to conceal the fact the company had Chinese employees? I noticed he refused to answer that, but I guess it’s normal for the ceo of a company to put out a memo saying “hey if anyone asks we don’t have any Chinese fricks working here”
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:47 am to ronricks
quote:
Because clearly Bubba's tool and die company in Houma or Thibodaux likely isn't going to have Chinese employees. It should be apparent to anyone with an IQ above 80 what I meant.
It's hard to tell the difference between when you're wrong on accident and allegedly wrong on purpose. It would be much easier to pick up on your alleged hyperbole if you stated factually correct things at a much higher clip than your current practice.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:47 am to FredbullTN
quote:
I noticed he refused to answer that
Chinese employees does not = fraud.
Does your company list out the nationality for every single employee they have to anyone that asks?
Think of what you are trying to argue here.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:48 am to ronricks
You are trying way too hard this am
You are melting down
You are melting down
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:49 am to therick711
quote:
if you stated factually correct things at a much higher clip then your current practice.
If the Gateway Pundit tweeted what I said verbatim I'm betting you would 'believe' it.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:49 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You are melting down
No that would be the folks who still are claiming fraud 4 years after an election.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:49 am to ronricks
quote:
ronricks
Still waiting for you to address the actual point of the thread.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:49 am to ronricks
quote:
Nowhere did I say Dominion was a Fortune 500 company.
It was implied because they didn't qualify as a large corporation by man power. So if you didn't mean to include them there, then your statement excluded them from both categories. I think the mistake here was believing you actually meant anything you posted. At least now it's clear that what you raised in opposition doesn't work in the literal OR the hyperbolic sense.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:49 am to therick711
quote:
Not that anyone could convince you, but just to destroy your argument for others, if everyone has Chinese employees and it isn't a big deal or a concern for anyone (and shouldn't be), why would you need a directive from the CEO to conceal that fact?
This is the kind of logic RR is incapable of understanding.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:50 am to FredbullTN
quote:
Yall just gonna let him slide by without answering why the CEO of dominion felt it was necessary to conceal the fact the company had Chinese employees?
The main concern is their access, not that they're Chinese. Why do they have access to information and controls that they shouldn't?
His deflection from the main point being that all fortune 500 companies have Chinese workers, was simply a deflection from the actual issue.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:50 am to ronricks
quote:
So having Chinese employees = fraud in your little pea sized brain?
That's not what anyone here is saying at all, you stupid TDS frick.
Address the facts laid out in response above:
1) They have employees in their Canadian office involved in US elections;
2) Some of those employees are foreign nationals who aren't even Canadian foreign nationals;
3) The Canadian office had access to the election infrastructure on election day; and
4) The CEO identified the above as something they should conceal.
You think there's no reason to question this? This is not suspicious? Of course it's not to you because you're fine with the election being stolen to get rid of your mean stepdaddy, OMB.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:51 am to Steadyhands
quote:
The main concern is their access, not that they're Chinese.
Ah, so now we are moving the goalposts after discovering how ridiculous the original logic being used was. Now, being Chinese isn't the issue all the sudden
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:55 am to therick711
quote:
It was implied
No, it wasn't. What I said is since Dominion is not a fortune 500 company it supports my statements even more. Do you understand this? I said there isn't/wasn't a Fortune 500 company that doesn't have Chinese employees. Dominion not being one further supports my hyperbolic statement. This isn't hard to understand.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:55 am to ronricks
quote:
quote:
You are melting down
No that would be the folks who still are claiming fraud 4 years after an election.
Right, it makes more sense to believe 81 million voted for the potato.
Haven't most of the fraud claims just been dismissed or refused to be heard? Has any of it really actually been debunked?
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:55 am to ronricks
Goalposts have never been moved. You aren't even in the stadium because you didn't read the letter to know what the actual information alleged is. See page 2 or this page where it was recapped. I'm not going to respond to anything else until you actually get on topic. I've thoroughly destroyed the other stuff.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 8:57 am
Page 4 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News