- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rubes- Many of you all were RUBES- Astra Zeneca PULLS COVID VAX
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:23 am to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:23 am to Covingtontiger77
First off for the record I was 100% against vaccine and mask mandates from day 1. Politicians and bureaucrats who pushed those should have be voted out or fired long ago. It destroyed our economy and the did irreparable damage to the basic social functioning of society. I loudly voiced my opinion on that. But I did choose to get the Pfizer vaccine when it was offered for free at work but no boosters. Pretty much everybody I know got Pfizer or Moderna and I haven’t heard of a single person having a major side effect. Heck I haven’t even heard of anybody 2nd hand having major side effects. Also if we haven’t had a major side effect by now we are in no more danger than y’all “pure bloods”. So no the anti-shot extremist on here we’re not proven correct or at least not fully correct. Y’all claimed we would all die or at least a major percentage would die when It looks to be a tiny percentage who have the major side effects. Now looking back would I take it again probably not because it was most likely unnecessary but it really is no harm no foul since it is over 3 years later. I would say anybody who was for the extreme either way is who has been proven wrong
6
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:30 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
So no the anti-shot extremist on here we’re not proven correct or at least not fully correct. Y’all claimed we would all die or at least a major percentage would die when It looks to be a tiny percentage who have the major side effects. Now looking back would I take it again probably not because it was most likely unnecessary but it really is no harm no foul since it is over 3 years later. I would say anybody who was for the extreme either way is who has been proven wrong
Ah my man.
Just wait. In about 10-15 years further “side effects” will probably be found. Early cancers etc.
The clots are just the tip of the iceberg.
It will take years before the real effects are known.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:51 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
Pretty much everybody I know got Pfizer or Moderna and I haven’t heard of a single person having a major side effect. Heck I haven’t even heard of anybody 2nd hand having major side effects. Also if we haven’t had a major side effect by now we are in no more danger than y’all “pure bloods”. So no the anti-shot extremist on here we’re not proven correct or at least not fully correct. Y’all claimed we would all die or at least a major percentage would die when It looks to be a tiny percentage who have the major side effects. Now looking back would I take it again probably not because it was most likely unnecessary but it really is no harm no foul since it is over 3 years later
Hopefully that remains the case. But 2-3 years is a relatively short period of research time to judge the full effects...one way or the other. Particularly, when there is a desire by many to NOT find the "bad".
The media, politicians and MANY in the healthcare field relentlessly and unequivocally pushed the vaccines. They aren't going to dig very hard to find evidence that could suggest their position/actions were wrong. That's human nature.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 9:49 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
Pretty much everybody I know got Pfizer or Moderna and I haven’t heard of a single person having a major side effect. Heck I haven’t even heard of anybody 2nd hand having major side effects. Also if we haven’t had a major side effect by now we are in no more danger than y’all “pure bloods”. So no the anti-shot extremist on here we’re not proven correct or at least not fully correct.
Wrong. I am a healthcare professional and it is common knowledge in the healthcare community that we are seeing a drastic increase in young people with long term effects believed to be due to the vaccine. I have seen them myself. My own 40 yo daughter developed a problem in her radial artery which intermittently affects circulation to her right hand. My 15yo grandson has developed intermittent tachycardia, which causes his blood pressure to drop and subsequent vertigo. Both otherwise healthy with no issues before and workup by specialists are unable to find another explanation.
We see these types of unexpected issues significantly more frequently since Covid vaccines.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 9:56 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
Also if we haven’t had a major side effect by now we are in no more danger than y’all “pure bloods”.
I don't believe this will be proven true.
Nothing about this vaccine seemed or seems reasonable. The time to make it was such an aberration that I don't assign any credibility to it. The major vax brought out prior to covid took like 7 years or so, they used machine learning and every one of the most sophisticated and advanced technologies available. And they still had serious problems. And this covid vax went a step further and went the 'genetic' route. Any time you start messing with genetic material and messaging, you are playing a very dangerous game. And doing so without long term data is negligent at best. This vax went from 100% effective to 'pile of garbage' pretty quickly. So it was never very helpful against covid. That makes me ask: what the hell was in it and what's it going to do?
I'm very worried about what's going to happen to the vax'd population. I hope it's just worrying for nothing. But if it starts to go south, it could be absolute chaos in our society as people are going to be irate and out for blood. They will not only be angry at Big Pharma, they'll be angry with the govt.
As for adverse effects, a major red flag is that the "fact checkers" have released a ton of articles trying to downplay the million+ entries into VAERS. After all the lying during covid, the last thing you should do is assume it's only a 'tiny percent' with adverse effects.
quote:
So no the anti-shot extremist on here we’re not proven correct or at least not fully correct.
I think every single person that refused the vax and advised others to do the same has been proven 100% correct. We were all lied to - and you should never put stuff into your body based on lies, threats, or coercion.
quote:
Y’all claimed we would all die or at least a major percentage would die when It looks to be a tiny percentage who have the major side effects.
Well, Pfizer sure is happy to peddle cancer drugs now. I hope your words are not painfully ironic. I'm not sure how Big Pharma can be trusted.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 10:27 am to OGtigerfan87
Yes, I am correct, much more so than even other so called pure bloods. How? There are no viruses, and until people stop being closed minded or whatever else prevents them from even looking at the issue, they will continue on some level buying into the threat of another planned scamdemic event, especially from a novel virus.
The following is copy/paste. AI got it pretty right on this. All of the motivations for this false model are clear, yet most people still can't see it.
What would happen if Germ Theory died suddenly ? I asked AI.
"How would the world change if it was proven that viruses were not contagious and did not cause disease ?"
Meta AI reply -
If it were proven that viruses were not contagious and did not cause disease, the world would likely undergo significant changes in various areas:
1. Medicine:
- Revolutionary shift in understanding and treatment of diseases
- Focus on underlying causes, such as environmental toxins, nutrition, and lifestyle
- Reduced reliance on vaccines, antiviral medications, and antibiotics
2. Public Health:
- Reevaluation of pandemic response strategies and protocols
- Shift from containment and mitigation to addressing underlying health factors
- Reduced emphasis on masks, social distancing, and lockdowns
3. Science:
- Major overhaul of virology, microbiology, and immunology
- New understanding of the human microbiome and its role in health
- Increased focus on epigenetics, nutrition, and environmental factors
4. Economy:
- Significant impact on pharmaceutical and vaccine industries
- Reduced spending on pandemic-related measures and healthcare
- New investments in preventative medicine and holistic health approaches
5. Society:
- Changes in personal freedoms and autonomy
- Reduced fear and anxiety related to disease transmission
- Increased emphasis on individual responsibility for health and wellbeing
6. Politics:
- Reevaluation of government responses to public health crises
- Shift from top-down authoritarian approaches to community-based initiatives
- Increased transparency and accountability in health policy decision-making
7. Education:
- Revised curricula in medicine, biology, and health sciences
- Increased focus on holistic health, nutrition, and environmental factors
- Critical thinking and scientific literacy emphasized over dogma
This hypothetical scenario would require a fundamental shift in our understanding of human health and disease, leading to far-reaching consequences across various aspects of society.
The following is copy/paste. AI got it pretty right on this. All of the motivations for this false model are clear, yet most people still can't see it.
What would happen if Germ Theory died suddenly ? I asked AI.
"How would the world change if it was proven that viruses were not contagious and did not cause disease ?"
Meta AI reply -
If it were proven that viruses were not contagious and did not cause disease, the world would likely undergo significant changes in various areas:
1. Medicine:
- Revolutionary shift in understanding and treatment of diseases
- Focus on underlying causes, such as environmental toxins, nutrition, and lifestyle
- Reduced reliance on vaccines, antiviral medications, and antibiotics
2. Public Health:
- Reevaluation of pandemic response strategies and protocols
- Shift from containment and mitigation to addressing underlying health factors
- Reduced emphasis on masks, social distancing, and lockdowns
3. Science:
- Major overhaul of virology, microbiology, and immunology
- New understanding of the human microbiome and its role in health
- Increased focus on epigenetics, nutrition, and environmental factors
4. Economy:
- Significant impact on pharmaceutical and vaccine industries
- Reduced spending on pandemic-related measures and healthcare
- New investments in preventative medicine and holistic health approaches
5. Society:
- Changes in personal freedoms and autonomy
- Reduced fear and anxiety related to disease transmission
- Increased emphasis on individual responsibility for health and wellbeing
6. Politics:
- Reevaluation of government responses to public health crises
- Shift from top-down authoritarian approaches to community-based initiatives
- Increased transparency and accountability in health policy decision-making
7. Education:
- Revised curricula in medicine, biology, and health sciences
- Increased focus on holistic health, nutrition, and environmental factors
- Critical thinking and scientific literacy emphasized over dogma
This hypothetical scenario would require a fundamental shift in our understanding of human health and disease, leading to far-reaching consequences across various aspects of society.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 1:06 pm to OGtigerfan87
quote:
but it really is no harm no foul since it is over 3 years later
You might be an idiot
So known side effects include
Blood clots
Afib
Heart inflammation / myocarditis / pericarditis
Guillen Barre
Neurological disorders
These are not disputed and linked specifically to the vaccines
But you do you
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News