Started By
Message

re: Tens of thousands of counterfeit ballots in Maricopa Co. 2020 election

Posted on 5/7/24 at 8:42 am to
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11273 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Didn't a bunch of Republicans spend like 7 million dollars for an independent audit on the Arizona election? Did they find any of this in their report?

An audit that doesn't test for the type of fraud that was employed isn't going to return a finding that suggests fraud.

For example, consider a manual recount of ballots. No matter how many times you just count the total ballots you are going to return the original result. If ballots were included or excluded from the count prior to you receiving the final grouping used your analysis will just return whatever the original result was, when in fact fraud could've been rampant.

Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7133 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 8:44 am to
quote:

For example, consider a manual recount of ballots. No matter how many times you just count the total ballots you are going to return the original result.


Didn't the actual Arizona recount show there were more votes for Biden than originally tabulated?
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13658 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

If ballots were included or excluded from the count prior to you receiving the final grouping used your analysis will just return whatever the original result was, when in fact fraud could've been rampant.



Or if counting in several states is stopped with one candidate winning in all those states and then counting resumes in a few hours and BINGO the losing candidate is now winning.

Its amazing (actually its bullshite).

Or the winning candidate loses dozens of bell weather districts and somehow comes out with the win, (which had NEVER happened before).
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20273 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

An audit that doesn't test for the type of fraud that was employed isn't going to return a finding that suggests fraud.

For example, consider a manual recount of ballots. No matter how many times you just count the total ballots you are going to return the original result. If ballots were included or excluded from the count prior to you receiving the final grouping used your analysis will just return whatever the original result was, when in fact fraud could've been rampant.


As correct as this is...the left will never recognize/admit this and sadly most of the left don't have enough brainpower to grasp what you said. You can't get their lies nor emotion out of the way in the first place to have a high brow conversation such as this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram