Started By
Message

re: Is there any historical evidence of diversity working out?

Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:54 am to
Posted by oldhickory1812
nashville
Member since Nov 2020
268 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:54 am to
quote:

The United States.


Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
3396 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.


And 90%+ Christian but they were comprised of people from English Isles, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Poland. The Italians and Polish didn't arrived until the 1870s-1930s as well. They were different from each other but still had some core similarities. Meanwhile today's immigrants from the Middle East and Africa are different in almost every way.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 7:42 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124542 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

it was close to 90% white
Diversity is not solely a racial issue. It is culture, religion, educational, etc. Not remotely.

E.g., in the nineteenth century, there were leagues of difference between German, Italian, Polish, Scandinavian, or Russian immigrants, all "White." American exceptionalism tapped the best of each within a social melting pot. We took cultural nuances and improved them.

American pizzas became something far better than their Italian forebears. Tacos, English muffins, french fries, were all formed from the same basis, yet all 100% American. E.g. the first "English" muffins were sold in England in the 1990's. They are purely American adaptations of crumpets.

I suspect your reference leans more to racially divisive efforts of neo-Marxists. With their influence, leftists now consider an inclusive adoption of things like Cinco de Mayo, Native American art or garb or nomenclature to be "cultural appropriation," and highly inappropriate. It is the literal antithesis to previous diverse inclusion directed toward a common goal. The leftist effort is to segregate ethnicities as a means of dividing and conquering the populace.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112719 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.


Ah, but diversity DID make America great. The Indians were getting stuck in primitive living. They didn't know what to do. Then they said 'We need diversity. Let's see if we can find some white people.'
And the whites taught them to read and write. They only made one bad trade on culture. The Indians introduced whites to tobacco. The whites introduced them to alcohol.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram