- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there any historical evidence of diversity working out?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:54 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The United States.
Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:38 am to oldhickory1812
quote:
Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.
And 90%+ Christian but they were comprised of people from English Isles, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Poland. The Italians and Polish didn't arrived until the 1870s-1930s as well. They were different from each other but still had some core similarities. Meanwhile today's immigrants from the Middle East and Africa are different in almost every way.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 7:42 am
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:12 am to oldhickory1812
quote:Diversity is not solely a racial issue. It is culture, religion, educational, etc. Not remotely.
it was close to 90% white
E.g., in the nineteenth century, there were leagues of difference between German, Italian, Polish, Scandinavian, or Russian immigrants, all "White." American exceptionalism tapped the best of each within a social melting pot. We took cultural nuances and improved them.
American pizzas became something far better than their Italian forebears. Tacos, English muffins, french fries, were all formed from the same basis, yet all 100% American. E.g. the first "English" muffins were sold in England in the 1990's. They are purely American adaptations of crumpets.
I suspect your reference leans more to racially divisive efforts of neo-Marxists. With their influence, leftists now consider an inclusive adoption of things like Cinco de Mayo, Native American art or garb or nomenclature to be "cultural appropriation," and highly inappropriate. It is the literal antithesis to previous diverse inclusion directed toward a common goal. The leftist effort is to segregate ethnicities as a means of dividing and conquering the populace.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:22 pm to oldhickory1812
quote:
Up until the hart-celller inmmigration act in 1965, The United States was not very diverse, it was close to 90% white, and it was doing pretty well.
Ah, but diversity DID make America great. The Indians were getting stuck in primitive living. They didn't know what to do. Then they said 'We need diversity. Let's see if we can find some white people.'
And the whites taught them to read and write. They only made one bad trade on culture. The Indians introduced whites to tobacco. The whites introduced them to alcohol.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News