Started By
Message

re: 1 in 5 mail-in-ballots was fraudulent according to a new study conducted by the Heartland

Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:56 am to
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
9932 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:56 am to
Math isn’t your best subject evidently.
21% of the respondents admitted to voter fraud
It’s not stating that ANOTHER 17% admitted this and ANOTHER 10% admitted that.
It’s simply saying that 1 out of every 5 mail ballots were fraudulent. That’s 20%!!
First it was Russia helped Trump win until it was proven false
Next it was 2020 was the most secure election ever, then it was if there was fraud, it wasn’t widespread. Now it’s 20% was fraudulent but here you are trying to now dispute the claims?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18145 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Math isn’t your best subject evidently.

My math is fine.

quote:

21% of the respondents admitted to voter fraud

I can also read and understand the meaning of words, which evidently is your problem.

I pasted from the post I was responding to. It did not say 21% of respondents admitted to voter fraud. It said -

"21% of respondents said they filled out a ballot on behalf of someone else."

That is 21% of respondents admitting to a particular type of voter fraud, that being they filled out a mail-in ballot for someone else.

17% admitted they voted in a state where they were no longer a permanent resident.

Those words mean the voter mailed in a ballot to a state they no longer live in. Those words do not mean they mailed in a ballot for someone else in a state they no longer live in. So, that 17% is distinct from the 21%.

quote:

First it was Russia helped Trump win until it was proven false

What? I've never argued that and do not believe it.

Just because I can do math and also understand written English does not mean I'm a f'n Leftist. It's actually embarrassing that you think nobody on the Right is educated.

quote:

Next it was 2020 was the most secure election ever, then it was if there was fraud, it wasn’t widespread. Now it’s 20% was fraudulent but here you are trying to now dispute the claims?

I have a thing about being logical and accurate. That's the only difference between you and me.

In fact, in my first post in this thread I clearly state that I believe there was a shite ton of frickery in the 2020 election. But then again, you have demonstrated you cannot read/comprehend.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram