- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George - so what are the chances it will actually happen?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:29 pm to GasMan
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:29 pm to GasMan
In regards to the school district, what stops a Bernhard or someone like him from building a privately owned school system and leasing it back to St George to keep it out the courts?
1
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:29 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided and/or available to every man, woman’s and school age child in the proposed boundaries. There are no grounds for “refunding stolen taxes”. It’s in the past.
Good luck with that argument.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:53 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided and/or available to every man, woman’s and school age child in the proposed boundaries
No city services were provided because there was no city to provide any. The parish did provide some services.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:54 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided and/or available to every man, woman’s and school age child
Bitch, I’ve been waiting 5 years for my trash to be picked up by new gold plated garbage trucks with drivers wearing tuxedos
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:01 pm to Locoguan0
quote:
Broomestown and LaMont "I Knew Him When He was a HORRIBLE School Admin" Cole have asked for a rehearing with the LSC.
And that old hag mary olive pearson
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:01 pm to Finch
Possibly, but maybe not.
To fight it in court is going to require that the books be opened and a thorough accounting of the spending take place. I agree w/ some others, I think the funding of the BRPD/FD and their respective pensions with tax dollars that were legally St George's is not the only troubling things that will be found when the books are opened. They will want to prevent that.
To fight it in court is going to require that the books be opened and a thorough accounting of the spending take place. I agree w/ some others, I think the funding of the BRPD/FD and their respective pensions with tax dollars that were legally St George's is not the only troubling things that will be found when the books are opened. They will want to prevent that.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:03 pm to Boston911
quote:
In regards to the school district, what stops a Bernhard or someone like him from building a privately owned school system and leasing it back to St George to keep it out the courts?
What about Catholic High football?
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:04 pm to Miketheseventh
quote:
think Landry will appoint a mayor and board for the city and then from there move forward
Which will quickly just be new people stealing your money without you getting anything usable out of it.
It’s the Louisiana way.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:07 pm to Locoguan0
quote:
Broomestown and LaMont "I Knew Him When He was a HORRIBLE School Admin" Cole have asked for a rehearing with the LSC
It'll be 4-3 denial.
Likely within the next 30 days
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:20 pm to TBoy
quote:
It has already happened in the eyes of the law.
No, the city-parish is now requesting a "rehearing" by the state supreme court. The SC only rendered its prior decision by a 4-3 vote, so it only takes one court justice to be swayed in their vote and then it could all be over for the City of St. George.
Keep in mind that the citizens voted for this city. Listen, I'm kind of liberal, but if the city-parish keeps trying to fight this, it is pretty much opposing democratic methods and usurping the will of the people.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:29 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided and/or available to every man, woman’s and school age child in the proposed boundaries. There are no grounds for “refunding stolen taxes”. It’s in the past
I only want taxes that went to services I did not receive back. Such as BRPD and BRFD and anything else. It’s pretty fricking simple.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:32 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
They can’t legally have a city but not legally have a school system
They’re called parish school boards for a reason right?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:43 pm to Finch
quote:
glad I now at least have some separation from them and the ilk that puts them in office.
Now we need to start working separating the parish president and mayor of Baton Rouge. The mayor of Baton Rouge no longer serves a majority of the parish, thus shouldn't also be the parish president.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:07 pm to teke184
quote:
Both have been dismissed from the case for a lack of standing.
Cole hasn't
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:19 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
quote:
Both have been dismissed from the case for a lack of standing.
Cole hasn't
Yes, and no.
He did not have standing to contest the validity/conformity of the petition (and election), but did have standing to assert adverse impact.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:40 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided and/or available to every man, woman’s and school age child in the proposed boundaries. There are no grounds for “refunding stolen taxes”. It’s in the past.
Tell that to the dozens of homeowners in my parents neighborhood whose homes flooded because Broome canceled regular cleanups of the drain systems in their area, you fricking prick.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 10:51 pm to TDFreak
quote:
City services were provided
Re-read that statement...
Posted on 4/30/24 at 11:44 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
quote:
Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year battle
Welp they got it right for once.
You can't split from BTR unless you were a part of BTR to begin with
Posted on 5/1/24 at 1:07 am to GasMan
I read this thread subject and assumed it was a bump from 2017.
Wow what kind of stupid pills is OP taking the La supreme court ruled in favor of it almost a week ago.
Wow what kind of stupid pills is OP taking the La supreme court ruled in favor of it almost a week ago.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News