Started By
Message

WSJ: Wall Street Has Spent Billions Buying Homes. A Crackdown Is Looming.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:05 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21457 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:05 am
quote:

Wall Street went on a home-buying spree. Now, more lawmakers want to stop it from ever happening again.

Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House have sponsored legislation that would force large owners of single-family homes to sell houses to family buyers. A Republican’s bill in the Ohio state legislature aims to drive out institutional owners through heavy taxation.

Lawmakers in Nebraska, California, New York, Minnesota and North Carolina are among those proposing similar laws.


quote:

These lawmakers say that investors that have scooped up hundreds of thousands of houses to rent out are contributing to the dearth of homes for sale and driving up home prices. They argue that investor buying has made it harder for first-time buyers to compete with Wall Street-backed investment firms and their all-cash offers.

Investors of all sizes spent billions of dollars buying homes during the pandemic. At the 2022 peak, they bought more than one in every four single-family homes sold, though more recently their activity has slowed as interest rates rose and supply became tighter. Two of the largest home-buying firms, Invitation Homes and AMH, are publicly traded companies, while a number of other companies, backed by private equity, hold portfolios of tens of thousands of homes nationwide.

Companies that buy single-family homes say their businesses provide renters the opportunity to live in desirable neighborhoods where they otherwise couldn’t afford to buy.

With home prices and rents near record highs around the U.S., legislators and officials at all levels of government have become more active on housing issues. States have passed new measures to fund more affordable housing, to allow builders to bypass local zoning laws and to make the eviction process more favorable to tenants.

Most calls to block large companies from snapping up homes come from liberals, but some conservatives also show an inclination to crack down.

This “corporate large-scale buying of residential homes seems to be distorting the market and making it harder for the average Texan to purchase a home,” Republican Gov. Greg Abbott
wrote on X last month. “This must be added to the legislative agenda to protect Texas families.”

Close to equal numbers of voting-age Republicans and Democrats said they would support a measure to block Wall Street firms from buying homes, according to a new study funded by the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank.


quote:

Advocates for the single-family rental industry, such as the National Rental Home Council, oppose such legislation and blame rising prices on an undersupply of new-construction homes. They also point to the relatively low number of homes owned by institutional investors, defined as those companies with portfolios of 1,000 homes or more. Some research estimates these companies own 3% to 5% of American rental homes.

In some American cities, institutional investors hold a much larger share of homes than they hold nationally. In Atlanta, nearly 11% of all rental homes in the five-county area are now owned by three real-estate companies, a recent study by researchers at Georgia State University found. A 2022 analysis by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said 21% of Atlanta rental homes were owned by some large institution
.


quote:

The bills in the House and Senate would cap rental-home ownership at no more than 50 homes for many companies, requiring them to sell off any more they already own. A bill in Minnesota, meanwhile, would limit ownership to 20 homes.

Bills to block landlords in the Ohio and Nebraska state legislatures were written in response to a small number of investors buying up hundreds of homes in a handful of Cincinnati and Omaha neighborhoods.

Louis Blessing III, a Republican representing suburbs of Cincinnati in the Ohio Senate, introduced a bill to tax large landlords so heavily that they would likely feel compelled to sell their properties. Blessing said he is concerned about real-estate companies developing monopoly power in some neighborhoods, while putting starter homes further out of reach for home buyers.


LINK
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22649 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:07 am to
People gonna love seeing their “equity” go poof.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71568 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:07 am to
Let's be honest, the right people will get paid off and it will continue.

My personal theory is home "ownership" will be considered a right, and a lot of these homes will be moved to a section 8 style situation. PE gets their money, government gets their kickbacks, and people get to live in houses.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 10:09 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96551 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:08 am to
Institutional buying is not great.

OTOH, forcing massive selloffs will cause its own set of problems. The markets are generally flooded now and buying is at a low point in part due to interest rates.


This sounds like a recipe for people with a lot of cash on hand to continue buying up property, such as happened during COVID, as long as they aren’t considered “institutional buyers.”
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
7115 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Companies that buy single-family homes say their businesses provide renters the opportunity to live in desirable neighborhoods where they otherwise couldn’t afford to buy.


They Gon get that NIMBY treatment
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7912 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:12 am to
I don’t know how this all ends up

But every time the US government gets involved in

quote:

A Crackdown


shite hits the fan
Posted by Rendevoustavern
Member since May 2018
1568 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

introduced a bill to tax large landlords so heavily that they would likely feel compelled to sell their properties


This, friends, is how you tank a market.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37610 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:21 am to
I read in the other thread that investor bought houses was minor. Somewhere between 1/20 to 1/5 houses being bought and owned by Wall Street/Venture Capital seems like a major portion of the market.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13816 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:28 am to
I'm pretty damn pro-free market and small government, but this is where I become a hypocrite (admittedly). There has to be regulation on this, if left unchecked another decade it could obliterate the middle class.

quote:

Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House have sponsored legislation that would force large owners of single-family homes to sell houses to family buyers. A Republican’s bill in the Ohio state legislature aims to drive out institutional owners through heavy taxation.


This is a good start, but it can't be something that is forced immediately. It has to slowly happen. And not entirely, but there has to be some sort of anti-trust type analysis done in each market that shows when an institutional buyer is at their limit and if they go over, or the market has too low of a supply, they can't buy any more.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 10:31 am
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39625 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:28 am to
quote:

In some American cities, institutional investors hold a much larger share of homes than they hold nationally. In Atlanta, nearly 11% of all rental homes in the five-county area are now owned by three real-estate companies, a recent study by researchers at Georgia State University found. A 2022 analysis by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said 21% of Atlanta rental homes were owned by some large institution.


Funny to see this. A friend of mine who is in finance in NY about 10 years ago was visiting me and he mused to me how cheap ATL real estate was compared to other major metros and how there was a lot of opportunity there. I remember starting to pay attention to those home shows when they were in ATL and looking up listings and I had to agree.

And here we are where apparently everyone else in finance caught on.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:11
Member since Jul 2020
8816 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:03 am to
Wall St = Blackrock = Global Satanic .00001% = DEMOLITION CREW of the "American Dream" (and all that is Good and Holy)


Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11227 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:23 am to
Great. The "do something" crowd wins again
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12296 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:23 am to
Since these bills will help middle class Americans at the expense of large corporation's profits……. I don’t expect them to see the light of day.

Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27249 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:36 am to
I was curious, so I looked up rentals in my neighborhood. Extremely small sample size, but one is listed. It's 300sq/ft smaller than my house and clearly hasn't been updated in the last half century.

The rent is 30% higher than my monthly mortgage payment. That's brutal.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 11:46 am
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
1174 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:39 am to
I don't even have a problem with these companies buying houses. What I have a huge problem with is they are allowed to do it with zero risks. If the bottom falls out of the market, you know who the politicians are going to rush to save from default? The corporations. They won't have to let go of inventory at a 30% discount to relieve their obligations. Joe American on the other hand...
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
616 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:47 am to
I was told that "Wall Street buying single family homes" was a conspiracy theory.
Posted by Limitlesstigers
Lafayette
Member since Nov 2019
2946 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:52 am to
Won't make a difference. Isn't institutional buying less than 2% of all Real Estate.
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31809 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:23 pm to
As a person that was completely fricked out of the housing market during this time, I’m happy about it. frick all these greedy assholes
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51419 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Companies that buy single-family homes say their businesses provide renters the opportunity to live in desirable neighborhoods where they otherwise couldn’t afford to buy.


As an apartment renter, there’s plenty of complexes in desirable neighborhoods.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91000 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

would cap rental-home ownership at no more than 50 homes for many companies, requiring them to sell off any more they already own. A bill in Minnesota, meanwhile, would limit ownership to 20 homes.


Investment groups will just create one holding company that will hold several different LLCs that own 50 homes each
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram